Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 13 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 47 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 164 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 659 |
Descriptor
| Formative Evaluation | 1008 |
| Program Effectiveness | 1008 |
| Program Evaluation | 316 |
| Foreign Countries | 225 |
| Program Implementation | 190 |
| Summative Evaluation | 189 |
| Evaluation Methods | 177 |
| Academic Achievement | 148 |
| Teaching Methods | 141 |
| Student Evaluation | 135 |
| Feedback (Response) | 118 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Claus, Richard N. | 11 |
| Quimper, Barry E. | 11 |
| Mingyu Feng | 7 |
| Choi, Kilchan | 4 |
| Duffy, Mark | 4 |
| Herman, Joan L. | 4 |
| Linlin Li | 4 |
| Randel, Bruce | 4 |
| Sanders, Felicia | 4 |
| Smolkowski, Keith | 4 |
| Audrey, Suzanne | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Teachers | 30 |
| Practitioners | 27 |
| Researchers | 23 |
| Administrators | 12 |
| Policymakers | 12 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Parents | 1 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| California | 39 |
| United Kingdom | 29 |
| Canada | 28 |
| Australia | 24 |
| New York | 22 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 22 |
| Texas | 19 |
| Pennsylvania | 17 |
| North Carolina | 16 |
| Florida | 15 |
| Illinois | 13 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 7 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 14 |
| Does not meet standards | 5 |
Caprano, Mary Margaret; Caprano, Robert M.; Helfeldt, Jack – Teacher Education Quarterly, 2010
Little research has been conducted to directly compare the effectiveness of different models of field-based learning experiences and little has been reported on the use of the Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) standards in establishing a formative assessment for teacher candidates (TCs). The current study used the…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Field Experience Programs, Program Effectiveness, Competence
Baartman, Liesbeth K. J.; Prins, Frans J.; Kirschner, Paul A.; van der Vleuten, Cees P. M. – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 2007
As assessment methods are changing, the way to determine their quality needs to be changed accordingly. This article argues for the use Competence Assessment Programs (CAPs), combinations of traditional tests and new assessment methods which involve both formative and summative assessments. To assist schools in evaluating their CAPs, a…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Formative Evaluation
Trevisan, Michael S. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2007
This article presents the state of practice of evaluability assessment (EA) as represented in the published literature from 1986 to 2006. Twenty-three EA studies were located, showing that EA was conducted in a wide variety of programs, disciplines, and settings. Most studies employed document reviews, site visits, and interviews, common…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Program Development, Formative Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of the District of Columbia's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of the Florida's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3, the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Ohio's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. The Ohio Department of…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Hawaii's Year 3 Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013; the Year 2 report for…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
The State-Specific Summary report serves as an assessment of Georgia's annual Race to the Top implementation. This year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees in Georgia highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. Among…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
Race to the Top. Rhode Island Report. Year 3: School Year 2012-2013. [State-Specific Summary Report]
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Rhode Island's Year 3 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3, many initiatives that were in the development…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
The State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Delaware's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. Delaware made…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of the New York's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3, the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Maryland's Year 3 Race to the Top implementation, highlighting successes and accomplishments, identifying challenges, and providing lessons learned from the implementation process. During Year 3 Maryland continued to prepare educators to fully implement the Common Core State Standards…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Massachusetts' Year 3 Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and Phase 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In School…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of North Carolina's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap
US Department of Education, 2014
This State-specific summary report serves as an assessment of Tennessee's annual Race to the Top implementation. The Year 3 report for Phase 1 and 2 grantees highlights successes and accomplishments, identifies challenges, and provides lessons learned from implementation from approximately September 2012 through September 2013. In Year 3,…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Academic Standards, Accountability, Achievement Gap

Peer reviewed
Direct link
