NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 14 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2010
This discussion foregrounds four key issues engaged by the articles presented in this special issue: the unique challenges and opportunities of environmental education evaluation, how to think well about the evaluation approaches and purposes that best match this domain, evaluation capacity building in environmental education and action, and…
Descriptors: Environmental Education, Public Policy, Accountability, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C.; Lipsey, Mark W.; Schwandt, Thomas A.; Smith, Nick L.; Tharp, Roland G. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2007
Productive dialogue is informed best by multiple and diverse voices. Five seasoned evaluators, representing a range of evaluation perspectives, offer their views in two- to three-page discussant contributions. These individuals were asked to reflect and comment on the previous chapters in the spirit of critical review as a key source of evidence…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Research Design, Inquiry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C.; Caracelli, Valerie J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Three primary stances on the wisdom of mixing evaluation models while mixing evaluation methods frame the challenges to defensible mixed-method evaluative inquiry. These challenges are addressed by shifting the mixed-method controversy from models toward other critical features of disparate traditions of inquiry. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2000
Reflects on an evaluation that aspired to be inclusive but generally failed to provide a backdrop for a discussion of inclusive evaluation. Identifies issues of absence of significant stakeholders, making of values by method, and the limited authority of the evaluation. Shows how easily deliberative intentions are distorted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Democracy, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Caracelli, Valerie J.; Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Two broad classes of mixed-method designs--component and integrated--that have the potential to combine elements of different inquiry traditions are described. The conceptual ideas advanced in the first chapter are illustrated through selected examples of several mixed-method integrated models. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Costantino, Tracie E.; Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Describes the evaluation of an intergenerational storytelling program, offering reflections on the evaluation of practice from an initial evaluation approach of interpretive responses to an ending framework of narrative for the evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Intergenerational Programs, Personal Narratives, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2003
Discusses Margaret Mead's evaluation of the first Salzburg Seminar (1947), a forum for international exchange of intellectual ideas and cultural customs. Concludes that Mead's evaluation was highly successful in that it created an evocative representation of the seminar that told readers what it was like for its participants. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, International Education, Personal Narratives, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation Practice, 1997
Advances the argument that advocacy in evaluation is inevitable when advocacy is understood as a value commitment to a particular representative ideal. The regulative ideal advanced in this article is a commitment to democratic pluralism. Three case examples illustrate these ideas. (SLD)
Descriptors: Advocacy, Case Studies, Democracy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alkin, Marvin C.; Christie, Christina A.; Greene, Jennifer C.; Henry, Gary T.; Donaldson, Stewart I.; King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
The editors give each of the theorists a chance to respond to questions posed about the context of the situation in relation to their own experience in the field, exploring how the exercise had an impact on their evaluation designs.
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Context Effect, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C.; And Others – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1989
A mixed-method conceptual framework was developed from the literature and refined through an analysis of 57 empirical mixed-method evaluations. Five purposes for mixed-method evaluation are identified (triangulation, complementarity, development, initiation, and expansion) and analyzed using the framework of 7 design characteristics. (TJH)
Descriptors: Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Methods Research, Multitrait Multimethod Techniques
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Mathie, Alison; Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997
The grounded experiences of two participatory evaluation case studies indicate that, when action is the desired outcome of an evaluation, somewhat less rather than more diversity of stakeholder participation is actually what is wanted. A narrowing of diversity is not necessarily in violation of democratic participatory aims. (SLD)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Cultural Pluralism, Democracy, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Greene, Jennifer C. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1990
Use-oriented approaches to evaluation have been challenged by contentions that the responsiveness of such evaluations undermines their technical quality. This discussion analyzes purported conflicts between these evaluation criteria of utility and accuracy by examining underlying assumptions related to evaluation's purpose and politics. (TJH)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
In 2001, the Bunche Academy was chosen by its district to join in partnership with the Da Vinci Learning Corporation to embark on an ambitious whole-school reform initiative, especially designed by the corporation for low-performing schools. In this chapter, the author describes how, as illustrated in the Bunche-Da Vinci Learning Academy context,…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Educational Change, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Greene, Jennifer C.; DeStefano, Lizanne; Burgon, Holli; Hall, Jori – New Directions for Evaluation, 2006
There is concern that the nation's schools are not preparing students to excel in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. At both precollege and postsecondary levels, much effort is needed to create and implement powerful STEM curricula, prepare and support highly qualified teachers, deliver effective instruction, and give…
Descriptors: Educational Quality, Program Effectiveness, Program Improvement, Educational Experience