NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 9 results Save | Export
Arizona State Dept. of Education, Phoenix. – 1982
The monitoring guide is designed to insure that local education agencies (LEAs) are meeting the mandate to provide a free, appropriate public education for handicapped students; and to assist public agencies in complying with applicable statutes, rules, and regulations to maximize program effectiveness. An introductory section offers a policy…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Data Collection, Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education
LINC Resources, Inc., Columbus, OH. – 1979
Four papers address approaches to evaluate the implementation of the individualized education program (IEP) provisions of P.L. 94-142, The Education for All Handicapped Children Act. The papers are "Auditing the IEP System: A Self-Audit System for Use by Local Education Agencies" by Beth Stephens and Daniel Macy, which examines a 10-step…
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abramson, Marty; McNamara, James F. – Planning and Changing, 1981
Present federal methods of monitoring the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (PL 94-142) only verify compliance with the law. They do not evaluate the law's effectiveness in improving disabled children's functional abilities. A number of educational parameters and outcomes can be used to measure PL 94-142's efficacy. (RW)
Descriptors: Compliance (Legal), Disabilities, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wolf, Robert L. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979
The Judicial Evaluation Method (JEM) is useful for aiding decision-making bodies to formulate policies. Broad public participation in complex issues is provided by JEM. (The conceptualization, policy formulation stages, and participant roles are identified; and the model is applied in two case studies). (MH)
Descriptors: Community Involvement, Court Role, Data Analysis, Data Collection
Hughes, James H.; Rice, Eric – 1978
Intended to assist local vocational education administrators in needs assessment and planning procedures for mainstreaming handicapped students, this manual presents a five-step process: (1) needs assessment and barrier identification (includes instruction in the nominal group technique process); (2), goal, objective, and strategy development (a…
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Decision Making, Educational Strategies, Evaluation Methods
Weber, Douglas L.; Weber, Margaret B. – 1979
The paper compares evaluation requirements established under P.L. 94-103 (Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act) and P.L. 94-142 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act). The correspondence of the requirements to traditional evaluation models is noted, and obstacles to implementation of the evaluation procedures are…
Descriptors: Developmental Disabilities, Evaluation Methods, Federal Legislation, Handicapped Children
Armstrong, Mary Lee – 1978
The practicum was designed to develop, implement, monitor, and evaluate a management system for developing and monitoring individual education plans (IEPs) for handicapped children as mandated by P.L. 94-142, the Education for All Handicapped Children Act. The products included an expectancy formula for educable mentally retarded (EMR) and…
Descriptors: Administration, Administrator Guides, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Clelland, Richard – 1978
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is the first major statutory civil rights enactment that protects handicapped individuals from discriminatory practices in employment and educational opportunities and in accessibility to federally supported programs and activities. The purpose of this handbook is to examine the statutory and…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Administrator Role, Check Lists, Civil Rights Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gillis-Olion, Marion; Olion, Ladelle – Early Child Development and Care, 1985
Describes a successful training model for early childhood educators (Grades K-three) and paraprofessionals who are unprepared to work with mainstreamed handicapped children. Specifically discussed are program goals and objectives; training modules; training activities; on-site visitation; evaluation; and discussion and recommendations. (Author/DST)
Descriptors: Disabilities, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Inservice Teacher Education