NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 1 to 15 of 163 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nolt, Kate L.; Leviton, Laura C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
Evidence-based programs and grassroots programs are often adapted during implementation. Adaptations are often hidden, ignored, or punished. Although some adaptations stem from lack of organizational capacity, evaluators report other adaptations happen in good faith or are efforts to better fit the local context. Program implementers, facilitators…
Descriptors: Fidelity, Programming, Program Implementation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2023
Teachers can use a variety of classroom management practices to help foster a classroom environment in which all students can learn. "Good Behavior Game" is a specific classroom management strategy that aims to improve social skills, minimize disruptive behaviors, and create a positive learning environment. Teachers place students into…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Educational Games, Intervention, Evidence Based Practice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cole Smith; Jemilia S. Davis – New Directions for Student Leadership, 2025
The growing demand for leadership competencies in the global workforce has expanded undergraduate programs integrating leadership theory, organizational development, and data-driven decision-making. This paper examines the development of an undergraduate leadership program evaluation at a liberal arts college in the southern United States.…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Study, Leadership Training, Program Development, Interdisciplinary Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mansi Wadhwa; Jingwen Zheng; Thomas D. Cook – Review of Educational Research, 2024
Clearinghouses set standards of scientific quality to vet existing research to determine how "evidence-based" an intervention is. This paper examines 12 educational clearinghouses to describe their effectiveness criteria, to estimate how consistently[underlined] they rate the same program, and to probe why their judgments differ. All the…
Descriptors: Clearinghouses, Standards, Evaluation Criteria, Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
The Campbellian validity typology has been used as a foundation for outcome evaluation and for developing evidence-based interventions for decades. As such, randomized control trials were preferred for outcome evaluation. However, some evaluators disagree with the validity typology's argument that randomized controlled trials as the best design…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach, Intervention, Evidence Based Practice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Benjamin K. Master; Elaine Lin Wang; Brian Phillips – RAND Corporation, 2025
This report presents summative findings from RAND's six-year evaluation of the BHP Foundation's Education Equity program. The evaluation is based on a review of funded partner organizations' internal program progress reports, performance indicators, and independent project evaluation reports; interviews with representatives from partner…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Program Evaluation, Equal Education, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boeren, Ellen; Rubenson, Kjell – International Review of Education, 2022
One of the core outcomes of the Sixth International Conference on Adult Education (CONFINTEA VI) held in 2009 was the Belém Framework for Action (BFA). Its signatories committed to monitoring the most recent development stages of adult learning and education (ALE) worldwide on a regular basis, and to present and assess results in a global report.…
Descriptors: Adult Learning, Adult Education, Lifelong Learning, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Juan David Parra; D. Brent Edwards Jr. – Critical Studies in Education, 2024
This paper seeks to raise awareness among educational researchers and practitioners of some significant weaknesses and internal contradictions of randomised control trials (RCTs). Although critiques throughout the years from education scholars have pointed to the detrimental effects of this experimental approach on education practice and values,…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evidence Based Practice, Educational Practices, Educational Policy
Katherine Dix; Shani Sniedze; Tamara Van Der Zant – Australian Council for Educational Research, 2024
This report presents a comprehensive overview of the reach and impact of Children's University in Australia and New Zealand. The Australian Council for Educational Research compiled available evidence to consolidate the evidence of the Children's University outreach program's extent and influence across the Australasian partnership. The…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Outreach Programs, Evidence Based Practice, Best Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Joshua Cowen; Ryan D. Nowak – National Education Policy Center, 2024
As publicly funded private school tuition systems have expanded, independent research has documented their negative outcomes. However, the prevalence of the programs continues to grow. This brief summarizes the research evidence about vouchers and identifies three areas of policy design that are especially important for student success and a…
Descriptors: Educational Vouchers, Educational Finance, Private School Aid, School Choice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zandniapour, Lily; Deterding, Nicole M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2018
Tiered evidence initiatives are an important federal strategy to incentivize and accelerate the use of rigorous evidence in planning, implementing, and assessing social service investments. The Social Innovation Fund (SIF), a program of the Corporation for National and Community Service, adopted a public-private partnership approach to tiered…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Research Needs, Evidence
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Miller-Young, Janice; Poth, Cheryl N. – International Journal for Academic Development, 2022
Increasing instructional quality in higher education is a key goal of educational development (ED) work, yet demonstrating complex outcomes remains challenging and lacks practical guidance. Evaluating ED services often relies on a reductionist approach characterized by linear assumptions of causal pathways to measure the extent to which…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Educational Development, Faculty Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Leach, John – School Science Review, 2021
The first of Ofsted's research reviews focused on science education. It is broad in scope, including content on school systems, the science curriculum, teaching, learning, assessment and materials -- with implications for practice. However, the review's scope does not provide much detail of the research on which it is based. I agree with many of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Science Education, Science Curriculum, Science Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ruble, Lisa; Ogle, Lindsey; McGrew, John – Psychology in the Schools, 2023
A training package for the Collaborative Model for Promoting Competence and Success (COMPASS), a multilevel consultation and coaching intervention for improved educational outcomes of students with autism, was developed and evaluated. Using a Hybrid Type 3 design with emphasis on implementation and a multidimensional approach to evaluating…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Implementation, Fidelity, Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Thomas Archibald – Journal of Human Sciences & Extension, 2019
The debate over what counts as credible evidence often occurs on a methodological level (i.e., about what technical applications of systematic inquiry provide believable, justifiable claims about a program). Less often, it occurs on an epistemological level (i.e., about what ways of knowing are appropriate for making claims about a program). Even…
Descriptors: Extension Education, Credibility, Evidence, Epistemology
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11