NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vishesh Kumar; Peter Wardrip; Rebecca Millerjohn – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024
Makerspaces, especially in their diverse proliferating forms, support a broad variety of learning outcomes. There is rich work in attempting to understand and describe these learning goals. Yet, there is a lack of support for practitioners and educators to assess the learning in events and programming at makerspaces (and similar environments)…
Descriptors: Shared Resources and Services, Observation, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kailea Saplan; Sam Abramovich; Peter Wardrip – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2024
Public libraries have embraced the popularity of maker education and makerspaces by integrating maker education in their program offerings, and by developing makerspaces that enable patrons to tinker and create products. But less attention has been paid to supporting librarians and maker educators in assessing the impact of these spaces. To expand…
Descriptors: Public Libraries, Design, Shared Resources and Services, Library Personnel
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kumar, Kari L.; Owston, Ron – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2016
The use of learning technologies is becoming ubiquitous in higher education. As a result, there is a pressing need to develop methods to evaluate their accessibility to ensure that students do not encounter barriers to accessibility while engaging in e-learning. In this study, sample online units were evaluated for accessibility by automated tools…
Descriptors: Electronic Learning, Higher Education, Student Participation, Comparative Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ke, Fengfeng; Hoadley, Christopher – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2009
This article reviews recent evaluation studies of online learning communities to provide a systematic understanding of how such communities are evaluated. Forty-two representative studies were selected and categorized into a newly developed taxonomy of online learning community evaluations. This taxonomy is divided into four components: evaluation…
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria