Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Program… | 84 |
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Researchers | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Smith, Nick L. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The principles of method development and assessment that have resulted from a long-range project at the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory to create new methods for program evaluation are summarized. (Author/AL)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Innovation, Program Evaluation

Anderson, Scarvia B. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
In this account of the drafting of the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) Standards, the author notes that the committee was concerned not only with a broad range of evaluation applications, but also with different forms of evaluation. The absence of specificity in the standards reflects the committee's steering between opposing views. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Committees, Evaluation Methods, Policy Formation, Program Evaluation

Ball, Samuel – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The variety of contexts, the politics of each situation, and the availability of resources all dictate variations in assessing outcomes. Seven major principles of program evaluation are considered, along with a cautionary note to the ambitious who expect large program effects. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrative Principles, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Summative Evaluation

House, Ernest R. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
Our scientific conceptions of evaluation are strongly influenced by underlying, deep-seated metaphors. This analysis draws upon recent philosophic work concerning the role of metaphors in all thought processes. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Evaluation Methods, Language Patterns, Metaphors

Cronbach, Lee J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
Standardization is inimical to innovation. Although the function of a standard is to standardize, the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) Standards avoid a standardizing effect. Their contribution lies mostly in the symbolism of their existence: to issue a set of standards is to proclaim maturity of thought for the field. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Improvement, Innovation, Program Evaluation

Sechrest, Lee; Yeaton, William E. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
The assessment of the outcomes of social programs should always include estimates of the size of the effects produced. Various approaches to this problem are discussed. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Social Indicators

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1982
The author, chair of the Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation, compares the Evaluation Research Society (ERS) and Joint Committee Standards and proposes that ERS and the Joint Committee consider merging their standard-setting efforts. (Author/LC)
Descriptors: Educational Practices, Evaluation Methods, Instructional Materials, Program Evaluation

Hendricks, Michael – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1981
An innovative new evaluation unit in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is detailed. This unit, the Office of Service Delivery Assessment (SDA), regularly briefs the Secretary on the services delivered to clients at the local level. The process of the SDA is described and conclusions are offered. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Delivery Systems, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Human Services

Yeaton, William; Sechrest, Lee – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
In no-difference research, no differences are found among groups or conditions. This article summarizes the existing commentary on such research. The characteristics of no-difference research, its acceptance by the research community, strategies for conducting such studies, and its centrality within the experimental and nonexperimental paradigms…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Literature Reviews, Models, Program Evaluation

Alkin, Marvin C.; Patton, Michael Quinn – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
The user-oriented and utilization-focused evaluation design of the two-year Caribbean Agricultural Extension Project, funded by Aid to International Development, is reviewed. The evaluation scope, stakeholders, evaluation team credibility, official approval of evaluation, and confidence in the evaluation process are addressed, within a…
Descriptors: Economic Development, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators

Shapiro, Jonathan Z.; Blackwell, David L. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
The design and implementation of a partnership evaluation at Southeastern Louisiana University in Hammond, Louisiana, during the 1985-86 academic year are discussed. Within a conversational format, a strategy is outlined for sharing evaluation responsibilities between the client and evaluator. (TJH)
Descriptors: Educational Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Institutional Evaluation

Jonas, R. Kirk, Ed. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1999
The nine articles of this theme issue provide overviews of legislative program evaluation and demonstrate the tensions caused by the conflict between utility and rigor in such evaluations. Legislative evaluation is concerned with evaluation utilization because legislators commission evaluations they expect to use. (SLD)
Descriptors: Decision Making, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Utilization

Bickman, Leonard – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Ten functions of program theory are reviewed: contributing to social science knowledge; assisting policymakers, discriminating between theory failure and program failure, identifying the problem and target group, providing program implementation description, uncovering unintended effects, specifying intervening variables, improving formative use…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Models, Problem Solving

Wargo, Michael J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1983
An overview of how program evaluation is organized within the federal government is presented. Using examples from three federal agencies, the author shows how evaluation units are formed, defines their functions, and discusses the barriers that must be overcome to manage a federal program evaluation office effectively. (Author)
Descriptors: Administration, Evaluation Methods, Federal Programs, Organizational Objectives

Gunn, Walter J. – New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1987
Strategies for use by clients who commission evaluation studies in the private, university, or governmental sector are outlined. Topics covered include establishing the purpose of the evaluation, assembling in-house management staff, specifying work and expertise requirements, establishing confidentiality and project control, and managing results.…
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Contracts, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs