Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 15 |
Descriptor
Classification | 29 |
Program Evaluation | 29 |
Evaluation Criteria | 23 |
Evaluation Methods | 13 |
Program Effectiveness | 9 |
Models | 7 |
Educational Policy | 6 |
Higher Education | 6 |
Academic Achievement | 5 |
Foreign Countries | 5 |
Performance Based Assessment | 5 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
Higher Education | 4 |
Postsecondary Education | 4 |
Audience
Administrators | 1 |
Policymakers | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Texas | 3 |
Australia | 2 |
Austria | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
France | 1 |
Iowa | 1 |
Italy | 1 |
Mexico | 1 |
Netherlands | 1 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
United States | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
National Assessment of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Kirk Vanacore; Erin Ottmar; Alison Liu; Adam Sales – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2023
Background: Implementation quality is a significant factor in determining whether a program has its intended impact (Durlak and DuPre, 2008; List et al., 2021). Therefore, when studying a program's efficacy, researchers must ensure that the program is implemented as intended to estimate its impact. To evaluate whether a program is being…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Fidelity, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Pérez Maldonado, Yara; De La Cruz Burelo, Eduard; Vicario Solorzano, Claudia Marina – Cogent Education, 2020
Most of the indicators for STEM programs in higher education such as the number of programs and students enrolled depend on what is considered as a STEM program. Currently, each country develops its own STEM indicators, without establishing comparable criteria across countries for the selection of the programs considered STEM, which make it…
Descriptors: STEM Education, Higher Education, Classification, Educational Indicators
Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2020
As part of its regulatory roles, the Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) is required to assess evidence of 'scholarship' that is put forward by providers, whether evidence of scholarship by individuals, such as teaching staff within the provider, or for the provider as a whole. TEQSA is seeking to review…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scholarship, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2018
In the context of the "Higher Education Standards Framework (Threshold Standards) 2015" (HES Framework), 'scholarship' means those activities concerned with gaining new or improved understanding, appreciation and insights into a field of knowledge, and engaging with and keeping up to date with advances in the field. This includes…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scholarship, Educational Research, Standards
Danilowicz, Bret; Judge, Rebecca; Hanson, Janet; Hughes, Sherri; Sundberg, Lori – Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 2020
A typology of budget-driven program reviews is categorized by two variables: the locus of responsibility and the timing of the review. When a budget-driven program review is first implemented during a crisis, the range of financial and administrative options are high, yet buy-in and match to mission are low. When a budget-driven program review is…
Descriptors: Budgets, Program Evaluation, Institutional Mission, Classification
Domaleski, Chris; D'Brot, Juan; Keng, Leslie; Keglovits, Russ; Neal, Ann-Michelle – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2018
Most states have developed or revised school accountability systems in response to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). While these systems include multiple indicators, to many stakeholders the outcome of central interest is the overall rating or classification produced for each school. These ratings are often used to identify schools that merit…
Descriptors: Accountability, Performance Based Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
Phillips, Alana S.; Sheffield, Anneliese; Moore, Michelle; Robinson, Heather A. – Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 2016
There is a need for a holistic usability evaluation framework that accommodates social constructivist online courses. Social knowledge construction may not be adequately evaluated using current frameworks. This qualitative research study examined the usability needs of a social constructivist online course. Data from an online course were analyzed…
Descriptors: Usability, Online Courses, Constructivism (Learning), Qualitative Research
Iacobucci, Dawn – Journal of Marketing Education, 2013
This research investigates the reliability and validity of three major publications' rankings of MBA programs. Each set of rankings showed reasonable consistency over time, both at the level of the overall rankings and for most of the facets from which the rankings are derived. Each set of rankings also showed some levels of convergent and…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Business Administration Education, Reliability, Validity
Alkin, Marvin C.; Vo, Anne T.; Christie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The act of valuing in an evaluation may be perceived in different ways. We consider the multiple theoretic perspectives that govern an evaluator's behavior and present a typology of evaluator valuing roles. Within this typology we describe three ways in which value judgments are typically reached--by stakeholders alone, stakeholders and evaluators…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Classification, Value Judgment, Role
Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, 2011
This brief (1) defines indicators, (2) places the concept into the context of the various ways indicators can be used in education, (3) explores some specific considerations and concerns that arise in evaluating results, (4) offers a categorization and examples of short-term outcome indicators for school use, and (5) stresses the need for policy…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Educational Indicators, Evaluation Methods, Educational Assessment
Ke, Fengfeng; Hoadley, Christopher – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2009
This article reviews recent evaluation studies of online learning communities to provide a systematic understanding of how such communities are evaluated. Forty-two representative studies were selected and categorized into a newly developed taxonomy of online learning community evaluations. This taxonomy is divided into four components: evaluation…
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria
Alberta Education, 2009
Alberta Education provides programming support and funding to school authorities to develop and implement special education programming for ECS children and students in grades 1 to 12. "Special Education Coding Criteria 2009/2010" outlines criteria within specific categories to help school authorities identify those children and students…
Descriptors: Individualized Programs, Criteria, Foreign Countries, Educational Environment
Darcy, Robert L.; And Others – 1979
A study was conducted to determine what particular outcomes are appropriate for use as criteria to evaluate vocational education programs. Procedures included (1) compiling a list of candidate outcomes, (2) conducting a literature and practice review, (3) formulating a strategy for having outcomes reviewed, (4) developing alternative outcome…
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Criteria, Literature Reviews, Program Development

Gallegos, Arnold – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1994
The Center for Research on Educational Accountability and Teacher Evaluation (CREATE) completed a meta-evaluation of school evaluation models in 1992. The procedures, categories, standards, and criteria of this study, which reviewed 51 models, are described. The results of the study, which reflect broadened dimensions of school evaluation, are…
Descriptors: Accountability, Classification, Criteria, Educational Research
Mines, Robert A.; And Others – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1982
Reviews the student services evaluation literature and presents a metamodel for selecting evaluation models. The metamodel is based on the comparison of the common dimensions of all evaluation models. Identifies five common dimensions that collectively determine the usefulness of any evaluation model. (RC)
Descriptors: Classification, Decision Making, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1 | 2