Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 7 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 17 |
Descriptor
Classification | 60 |
Evaluation Methods | 60 |
Program Evaluation | 60 |
Models | 19 |
Evaluation Criteria | 13 |
Research Methodology | 12 |
Higher Education | 10 |
Program Effectiveness | 10 |
Comparative Analysis | 7 |
Educational Assessment | 6 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 7 |
Postsecondary Education | 6 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 5 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
Middle Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Every Student Succeeds Act… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Huey T. Chen; Liliana Morosanu; Victor H. Chen – Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 2024
The Campbellian validity typology has been used as a foundation for outcome evaluation and for developing evidence-based interventions for decades. As such, randomized control trials were preferred for outcome evaluation. However, some evaluators disagree with the validity typology's argument that randomized controlled trials as the best design…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Systems Approach, Intervention, Evidence Based Practice
Mark, Melvin M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
Premised on the idea that evaluators should be familiar with a range of approaches to program modifications, I review several existing approaches and then describe another, less well-recognized option. In this newer option, evaluators work with others to identify potentially needed adaptations for select program aspects "in advance." In…
Descriptors: Evaluation Research, Evaluation Problems, Evaluation Methods, Models
Blagg, Kristin; Blom, Erica; Kelchen, Robert; Chien, Carina – Urban Institute, 2021
Policymakers have expressed increased interest in program-level higher education accountability measures as a supplement to, or in place of, institution-level metrics. But it is unclear what these measures should look like. In this report, we assess the ways program-level data could be developed to facilitate federal accountability. Evidence shows…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Accountability, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency, 2020
As part of its regulatory roles, the Australian Government Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) is required to assess evidence of 'scholarship' that is put forward by providers, whether evidence of scholarship by individuals, such as teaching staff within the provider, or for the provider as a whole. TEQSA is seeking to review…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scholarship, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Lynch-Alexander, Erin – Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 2017
Duplicating processes and procedure with anticipation of deviating outcomes is the defining trait of insanity as attributed to a quote by Albert Einstein. It is the antithesis to innovation, which is what is needed in higher education to create impactful changes in the outreach we should be providing to the community. What is important for those…
Descriptors: Outreach Programs, Classification, Alignment (Education), Models
Tang, Jian Jing – Chinese Education & Society, 2018
The author's aim is to explore the school principal training and development landscape in Macau. The continuities and changes in the professional development of principals in Macau over the last two decades are identified. Using Huber's theoretical framework, key pre- and in-service policy documents from 1993 to 2017 that have shaped the…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Government Role, Foreign Countries, Principals
Domaleski, Chris; D'Brot, Juan; Keng, Leslie; Keglovits, Russ; Neal, Ann-Michelle – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2018
Most states have developed or revised school accountability systems in response to the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA). While these systems include multiple indicators, to many stakeholders the outcome of central interest is the overall rating or classification produced for each school. These ratings are often used to identify schools that merit…
Descriptors: Accountability, Performance Based Assessment, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria
González-Brenes, José P.; Huang, Yun – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2015
Classification evaluation metrics are often used to evaluate adaptive tutoring systems-- programs that teach and adapt to humans. Unfortunately, it is not clear how intuitive these metrics are for practitioners with little machine learning background. Moreover, our experiments suggest that existing convention for evaluating tutoring systems may…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Student Behavior
Fryda, Candice M.; Hulme, Polly A. – Journal of School Nursing, 2015
One prevention strategy for childhood sexual abuse (CSA) involves educational programs delivered to children in the school environment. The purpose of this integrative literature review was to determine the state of the science on school-based CSA prevention programs. The authors extracted data from 26 articles that fit inclusion criteria to…
Descriptors: Sexual Abuse, Prevention, Child Abuse, Educational Environment
Iacobucci, Dawn – Journal of Marketing Education, 2013
This research investigates the reliability and validity of three major publications' rankings of MBA programs. Each set of rankings showed reasonable consistency over time, both at the level of the overall rankings and for most of the facets from which the rankings are derived. Each set of rankings also showed some levels of convergent and…
Descriptors: Psychometrics, Business Administration Education, Reliability, Validity
Alkin, Marvin C.; Vo, Anne T.; Christie, Christina A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2012
The act of valuing in an evaluation may be perceived in different ways. We consider the multiple theoretic perspectives that govern an evaluator's behavior and present a typology of evaluator valuing roles. Within this typology we describe three ways in which value judgments are typically reached--by stakeholders alone, stakeholders and evaluators…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Classification, Value Judgment, Role
Haughton, Noela; Keil, Virginia – Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education (CITE Journal), 2013
The debate surrounding teacher quality often fails to differentiate effectively between teacher-preparation providers. This failure also extends to distinguishing between teachers prepared in traditional campus-based accredited programs from those prepared in unaccredited campus-based programs. This paper compares assessment infrastructure and…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Accreditation (Institutions), Teacher Effectiveness, Expenditures
Center for Mental Health in Schools at UCLA, 2011
This brief (1) defines indicators, (2) places the concept into the context of the various ways indicators can be used in education, (3) explores some specific considerations and concerns that arise in evaluating results, (4) offers a categorization and examples of short-term outcome indicators for school use, and (5) stresses the need for policy…
Descriptors: Educational Policy, Educational Indicators, Evaluation Methods, Educational Assessment
What Works Clearinghouse, 2014
This "What Works Clearinghouse Procedures and Standards Handbook (Version 3.0)" provides a detailed description of the standards and procedures of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC). The remaining chapters of this Handbook are organized to take the reader through the basic steps that the WWC uses to develop a review protocol, identify…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Guides, Intervention, Classification
Ke, Fengfeng; Hoadley, Christopher – Educational Technology Research and Development, 2009
This article reviews recent evaluation studies of online learning communities to provide a systematic understanding of how such communities are evaluated. Forty-two representative studies were selected and categorized into a newly developed taxonomy of online learning community evaluations. This taxonomy is divided into four components: evaluation…
Descriptors: Classification, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria