NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Education Level
High Schools1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 67 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bruton, Ronald West – Elementary School Journal, 1975
A recently developed methodology for evaluating published materials was used to evaluate the objectives of the Distar Language I program, a language skills program for educationally disadvantaged children. (BRT)
Descriptors: Behavioral Objectives, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods, Language Skills
Nearine, Robert J. – 1980
In this manual, project directors of the Intensive Reading Instructional Teams (IRIT) program in Hartford, Connecticut, public schools, are provided with suggestions for evaluating compensatory programs such as the IRIT. Three models for basic Title I evaluation are discussed and compared: a norm-referenced model, a control group design, and a…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pellegrini, A.D.; And Others – Psychology in the Schools, 1981
Investigated two variance estimation procedures on a normed test treated as a criterion-referenced test. The first estimation procedure estimated the standard deviation systematically higher, whereas the second procedure's estimation was systematically lower than the actual standard deviation. (Author/RC)
Descriptors: Credibility, Criterion Referenced Tests, Disadvantaged Youth, Educationally Disadvantaged
1975
This Local Education Agency (LEA) Self Analysis Instrument for ESEA Title I is one of the products developed and validated by the SEA (State Educational Agencies) Management of Compensatory Education, a multistate project funded through ESEA Title V-505. An additional product of the project was a LEA Process Model said to support the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Assessment, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods
Claus, Richard N.; Quimper, Barry E. – 1995
The Saginaw Prekindergarten program for educationally disadvantaged children is designed to provide 4-year-old children with an environment that will enable them to develop skills needed for future success in school. The process evaluation conducted in 1995 consisted of an on-site, half-day classroom observation at 8 of the 15 prekindergarten…
Descriptors: Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods, Formative Evaluation, Language Acquisition
Alkin, Marvin C.; Freeman, Marie – 1986
Drawing from on-site assessments of the implementation and effectiveness of 30 selected Extended Opportunity Programs and Services (EOPS) programs operating at California community colleges, this report synthesizes information collected between September 1985 and May 1986 through student and faculty/staff surveys, 1,025 detailed interviews with…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Educational Counseling, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods
1975
This State Education Agency (SEA) Self Analysis Instrument for ESEA Title I is one of the products developed and validated by the SEA (State Educational Agencies) Management of Compensatory Education, a multistate project funded through ESEA Title V-505. An additional product of the project was a SEA Process Model said to support the…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Assessment, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods
Provus, Malcolm M. – 1969
A schema for the evaluation of ESEA Title I and III programs is based upon the view that evaluation should be considered as a process for program development and stabilization. Following a general systems approach and applying management theory, the model includes methods for using evaluation as a program improvement tool, with educational…
Descriptors: Bibliographies, Educational Programs, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Criteria
Alkin, Marvin C.; Freeman, Marie – 1988
Drawing from on-site evaluations of the Extended Opportunity Programs and Services (EOPS) operating at 22 California community colleges in 1987-88, this report assesses the programs with respect to management, outreach and recruitment, instructional development, counseling, transfer and transition, special activities, financial aid, and staff…
Descriptors: Community Colleges, Educational Counseling, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coulson, John E. – Journal of Educational Statistics, 1978
Problems encountered in large-scale educational evaluations are discussed using the evaluation of the Emergency School Aid Act as an example. This extensive article focuses primarily on methodological issues. (JKS)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Analysis, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education
Bronx Community Coll., NY. – 1977
The objective of the final conference was to provide an opportunity for the 10 Associate institutions of National Project II to share what they had learned, both individually and as a consortium. Each institution had been chosen to participate in the project on the basis of an exemplary program for underprepared college students. This document…
Descriptors: Conference Reports, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods, Federal Aid
National Advisory Council on the Education of Disadvantaged Children, Washington, DC. – 1979
This report reviews the effectiveness of national evaluation activities undertaken by the United States Office of Education, Office of Evaluation and Dissemination (OED) with regard to Title I compensatory education programs. Three major evaluations undertaken by the OED and technical assistance activities developed by the OED are described and…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Collection, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Abrams, Allan S.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Education, 1979
Evaluation of large-scale programs is problematical because of inherent bias in assignment of treatment and control groups, resulting in serious regression artifacts even with the use of analysis of covariance designs. Nonuniformity of program implementation across sites and classrooms is also a problem. (Author/GSK)
Descriptors: Analysis of Covariance, Comparative Analysis, Compensatory Education, Educational Assessment
Office of Education (DHEW), Washington, DC. – 1966
THE OPERATIONS AND PROGRAMS CONDUCTED UNDER TITLE I OF THE ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT FOR THE EDUCATION OF DISADVANTAGED CHILDREN ARE DESCRIBED IN A SUMMARY OF THE INDIVIDUAL REPORTS SUBMITTED BY 50 STATES, THREE TERRITORIES, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. THE REPORTS, PREPARED IN RESPONSE TO A U.S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION (USOE) REQUEST…
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Data Processing, Educational Programs, Educationally Disadvantaged
North Dakota State Dept. of Public Instruction, Bismarck. – 1971
Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I programs in North Dakota are evaluated in this Annual Report. The first part of the report covers staff activities, a brief demographic view of North Dakota, public and nonpublic school participation, financial data, instructional activities, major accomplishments, and statistical data about the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Educational Finance, Educationally Disadvantaged, Evaluation Methods
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5