Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 6 |
Descriptor
Check Lists | 97 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 97 |
Program Evaluation | 97 |
Program Development | 23 |
Evaluation Criteria | 21 |
Evaluation Methods | 21 |
Program Implementation | 19 |
Guidelines | 15 |
Records (Forms) | 14 |
Disabilities | 13 |
Teaching Methods | 13 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Melaville, Atelia I. | 2 |
Alvir, Howard P. | 1 |
Anderson, Beverly L. | 1 |
Anderson, M. Elaine, Ed. | 1 |
Baine, David | 1 |
Blank, Martin J. | 1 |
Boone, Randall | 1 |
Boren, Lisa C. | 1 |
Bowers, John J. | 1 |
Carver, W. | 1 |
Cherasaro, Trudy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 7 |
Secondary Education | 2 |
Elementary Education | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 29 |
Administrators | 13 |
Teachers | 7 |
Parents | 6 |
Media Staff | 4 |
Policymakers | 4 |
Community | 1 |
Counselors | 1 |
Students | 1 |
Support Staff | 1 |
Location
California | 4 |
Wisconsin | 4 |
Maryland | 3 |
Florida | 2 |
Illinois | 2 |
Missouri | 2 |
Oklahoma | 2 |
Texas | 2 |
Arizona | 1 |
Australia | 1 |
Canada | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools Technical Assistance Center (REMS), 2022
Herein, the Readiness and Emergency Management for Schools (REMS) Technical Assistance (TA) Center provides a list of resources for school administrators to use to assist in school safety efforts. The list includes the following categories of resources: (1) Before an Emergency; (2) During an Emergency; (3) After an Emergency; and (4) Emergency…
Descriptors: Administrators, School Administration, Administrator Role, Emergency Programs
Cherasaro, Trudy; Yanoski, David; Swackhamer, Lyn – Regional Educational Laboratory Central, 2015
This guide was developed to provide guidance to states or districts wishing to monitor implementation of educator evaluation systems. It describes a three-step process: develop state guidelines for educator evaluation systems; develop data collection methods; and determine adherence criteria and review data against criteria. The process was…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Program Implementation, Guidelines, Data Collection
Center for the Study of Education Policy, 2016
The Center for the Study of Education Policy utilized several grants to develop principal preparation program tools to assist programs in the implementation of the new standards and requirements for the licensure of school principals and assistant principals. Also, with the help of another grant in partnership with several PK-12 school districts,…
Descriptors: Principals, Administrator Education, Elementary Secondary Education, Program Implementation
Morris, Genelle – ProQuest LLC, 2013
Policy makers and educators across the nation are incorporating new standards and assessments into evaluation systems, designed to impact teacher effectiveness and student achievement. New York is one of the states that have developed a teacher evaluation system, now fully implemented in all of its 697 public school districts. As the results from…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, State Standards, Public Schools
Christensen, L.; Carver, W.; VanDeZande, J.; Lazarus, S. – Council of Chief State School Officers, 2011
The Council of Chief State School Officers' "Accommodations Manual: How to Select, Administer, and Evaluate the Use of Accommodations for Instruction and Assessment of Students with Disabilities" was first developed to establish guidelines for states to use for the selection, administration, and evaluation of accommodations for…
Descriptors: Academic Accommodations (Disabilities), Academic Achievement, Guides, Program Development

Houser, Larry L.; Heimer, Ralph T. – Arithmetic Teacher, 1978
Conditions essential to the success of an individualized system of instruction are discussed. A checklist for evaluating such a system faced on these conditions is given. (MP)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Curriculum, Elementary Secondary Education, Individualized Programs
Ohio State Dept. of Education, Columbus. Div. of Elementary and Secondary Education. – 1981
Prepared to assist Ohio school personnel in improving nutrition education, this self-appraisal checklist can be used to survey and assess an existing program and to compare it to a quality program exemplified by the checklist items. A brief description of how to use the checklist is followed by 89 items divided into seven categories: philosophy,…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Educational Assessment, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria
Arizona State Dept. of Education, Phoenix. – 1975
This guidebook is designed to help local districts determine how well they comply with the spirit of the Title IX requirements against sex discrimination, which in turn could aid in compliance with the letter of the law. The document's first section presents samples of required antidiscrimination policy statements issued by two districts. The…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Civil Rights Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, Guidelines

Tymitz-Wolf, Barbara – Teaching Exceptional Children, 1982
Addresses pitfalls in formulating individualized education program (IEP) goals and objectives for handicapped students as mandated by P.L. 94-142 (the Education for All Handicapped Children Act). Short-term objectives are subordinate to goals and should reflect a hierarchical relationship to goal. Some of the inadequacies of written objectives are…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Disabilities, Educational Objectives, Elementary Secondary Education

Gemake, Josephine S. – Reading Improvement, 1979
Presents a check list created by teachers to be used as an evaluation instrument in observations of reading laboratories in the New York City area. Reflects their ideas about the essential components of a remedial reading program. (FL)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation

Kemp, Mike – American Annals of the Deaf, 1988
The CIPP (Context Input Process Product) Evaluation Model is recommended for use in self-assessment of sign language programs. Five areas should be assessed: personnel selection, curriculum, student placement, media utilization, and supervision. For each area, a checklist is offered to determine whether existing goals and objectives require…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Hearing Impairments, Models
Rauch, Sidney J. – 1990
Providing guidance to the administrator, supervisor, or reading consultant who may be called upon to evaluate a school or system-wide reading program, this practical checklist has been so arranged that each item calls for a "yes" answer. The checklist includes most of the effective features of a reading program as related to teachers,…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Parent Student Relationship
Clary, Linda Mixon – 1989
Intended to translate the content of the 1985 report "Becoming a Nation of Readers" into particular points that all groups can look for in their schools, this checklist consists of 30 questions to help a school or school system assess its strengths and weaknesses. The 30 questions evaluate the categories of philosophy, curriculum…
Descriptors: Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Informal Assessment, Program Evaluation

Goldberg, Donald; And Others – Volta Review, 1989
The Parent Checklist was developed for parents of hearing-impaired children to use when evaluating prospective mainstreamed classrooms. Areas of assessment include: physical environment, teacher, attitude of school, information regarding the student, and special services. (Author/PB)
Descriptors: Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Purvis, Johnny R.; Boren, Lisa C. – NASSP Bulletin, 1991
As Mississippi's experience shows, there are five necessary stages for staff development: preplanning (forming a committee), planning, implementation, evaluation, and maintenance. This article examines each phase, provides checklists, and highlights the principal's responsibility during each phase. (eight references) (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrator Responsibility, Check Lists, Elementary Secondary Education, Guidelines