Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Formative Evaluation | 10 |
| Program Evaluation | 10 |
| Science Programs | 10 |
| Models | 6 |
| Program Effectiveness | 6 |
| Program Improvement | 6 |
| Science Education | 6 |
| Summative Evaluation | 6 |
| Science Teachers | 5 |
| Secondary School Science | 4 |
| Elementary School Science | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Society for Research on… | 1 |
Author
| Alexander, Baine B. | 2 |
| Penberthy, Debra L. | 2 |
| Denton, Denice | 1 |
| Eric Ambroso | 1 |
| Hambleton, Ronald K. | 1 |
| Jaclyn Tejwani | 1 |
| Jordan Allen | 1 |
| Loue, William E., III | 1 |
| McIntosh, Ian B. | 1 |
| O'Reilly, Robert P. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 5 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 5 |
| Teachers | 5 |
| Researchers | 4 |
| Administrators | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Jaclyn Tejwani; Eric Ambroso; Jordan Allen – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022
Black, Indigenous, and Latinx students often participate in programs being evaluated, yet they are generally excluded from being involved in the evaluation process. In addition, the staff of organizations that conduct evaluations are predominately White and often implement research methods that may perpetuate racial biases and unequal power…
Descriptors: Participatory Research, Physical Sciences, African American Students, Hispanic American Students
Loue, William E., III; And Others – 1973
A study is being conducted to evaluate and revise an innovative science program which was field tested in three schools representative of urban, rural, and suburban populations. The objectives of the study are to assess the program's actual performance of its stated objectives and to inform the program developer of inherent strengths and…
Descriptors: Diagnostic Tests, Formative Evaluation, Individualized Programs, Instructional Innovation
Penberthy, Debra L.; Alexander, Baine B.; McIntosh, Ian B.; Denton, Denice – 1996
This report is based on the analysis of initial interviews with the staff of the Freshmen Learning Community Program (FLCP) staff. FLCP is a pilot program in engineering education that focuses on diversity and cultural change. Data includes structured open-ended interviews and observations of discussion sections and learning program meetings.…
Descriptors: College Curriculum, Cultural Pluralism, Educational Strategies, Engineering Education
Alexander, Baine B.; Penberthy, Debra L. – 1995
This report is based on the analysis of initial interviews with the staff of the Freshmen Learning Community Program (FLCP). FLCP is a pilot program in engineering education that focuses on diversity and cultural change. The primary purpose of this evaluative study is to provide feedback while the learning community program is being implemented.…
Descriptors: College Curriculum, College Freshmen, Cultural Pluralism, Educational Strategies
Dependents Schools (DOD), Washington, DC. Pacific Region. – 1988
Presented is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science supervisors, and teachers to identify strengths and weaknesses of science programs in grades kindergarten through six. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning: school name and…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Elementary School Science, Formative Evaluation, Models
Dependents Schools (DOD), Washington, DC. Pacific Region. – 1988
This document is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science department chairpersons and teachers in identifying strengths and weaknesses of science programs in middle and high schools. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning:…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Guides, Models, Program Effectiveness
Dependents Schools (DOD), Washington, DC. Pacific Region. – 1988
This is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science supervisors, and teachers in identifying strengths and weaknesses of science programs in grades five through eight. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning: school name and…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Guides, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools
Dependents Schools (DOD), Washington, DC. Pacific Region. – 1988
This is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science supervisors, and teachers in identifying strengths and weaknesses of science programs in grades kindergarten through 12. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning: school name and…
Descriptors: Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Guides
1988
This is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science supervisors, and teachers in identifying strengths and weaknesses of science programs in grades seven through eight. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning: school name and…
Descriptors: Elementary School Science, Elementary Secondary Education, Formative Evaluation, Junior High Schools
O'Reilly, Robert P.; Hambleton, Ronald K. – 1971
This paper presents the designs underlying an IPI approach to ninth grade science implemented in the Jamesville-DeWitt schools in New York State. Briefly described are the generalizable instructional model, evaluation systems for assessing individual performance and the effectiveness of the instructional program and the support systems which make…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Computer Oriented Programs, Data Processing, Evaluation Methods

Peer reviewed
Direct link
