Descriptor
| Intermediate Grades | 3 |
| Junior High Schools | 3 |
| Program Evaluation | 3 |
| Middle Schools | 2 |
| Science Education | 2 |
| Science Programs | 2 |
| Active Learning | 1 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Educational Change | 1 |
| Enrichment Activities | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Roeper Review | 1 |
Publication Type
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Siegenthaler, David – 1986
For 37 states in the United States, Project Wild has become an officially sanctioned, distributed and funded "environemtnal and conservation education program." For those who are striving to implement focused, sequential, learning programs, as well as those who wish to promote harmony through a non-anthropocentric world view, Project…
Descriptors: Criticism, Debate, Educational Change, Environmental Education
Dependents Schools (DOD), Washington, DC. Pacific Region. – 1988
This is a checklist for use by science coordinators, school principals, science supervisors, and teachers in identifying strengths and weaknesses of science programs in grades five through eight. It can also be used by science coordinators during school visits. This guide contains space for recording information concerning: school name and…
Descriptors: Formative Evaluation, Guides, Intermediate Grades, Junior High Schools
Peer reviewedRohrer, Jane; Welsch, Sue – Roeper Review, 1998
Describes a summer program for high-achieving middle school girls in math and science. It covers the organization, curriculum, instruction, and outcomes of the program and describes elements that students rated favorably (such as being outside a lot) and those which needed to be changed (such as too great an age span) for the second summer. (DB)
Descriptors: Active Learning, Enrichment Activities, Females, Gifted


