Descriptor
Evaluation Methods | 6 |
Pretesting | 6 |
Program Evaluation | 6 |
Research Design | 6 |
Control Groups | 4 |
Pretests Posttests | 4 |
Achievement Gains | 3 |
Research Methodology | 3 |
Achievement Tests | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Compensatory Education | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Bunker, Kerry A. | 1 |
Cohen, Stephen L. | 1 |
Faddis, Bonnie J. | 1 |
Fitz-Gibbon, Carol Taylor | 1 |
Hubert, John A. | 1 |
Hunter, William J. | 1 |
Morris, Lynn Lyons | 1 |
Weber, Margaret B. | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 3 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Illinois | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
Comprehensive Tests of Basic… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hunter, William J. – CEDR Quarterly, 1979
Separate selection and pretesting of students eliminate regression effects in the pre-post achievement gain measured in the RMC Model--A method of program evaluation. (CP)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Data Analysis, Educational Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Bunker, Kerry A.; Cohen, Stephen L. – Training and Development Journal, 1978
After offering some possible explanations for the existing inadequacies in evaluating organizational training programs, the authors discuss several evaluation issues, particularly internal validity. Methods for overcoming evaluation inadequacies and the implications for better controlled evaluation designs are also covered. (EM)
Descriptors: Control Groups, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, On the Job Training
Fitz-Gibbon, Carol Taylor; Morris, Lynn Lyons – 1978
The evaluation design, which prescribes when and from whom to gather data, is described as significant because it can lend credibility to evaluation results. The objectives of this booklet are to aid the evaluator in: choosing a design; putting it into operation; and analyzing and reporting the data. Examples include both formative and summative…
Descriptors: Analysis of Variance, Control Groups, Educational Research, Evaluation Methods
Hubert, John A. – 1978
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I Evaluation and Reporting System is a method for giving a federally funded project in reading or math an overall score on its cognitive effectiveness. This System introduced the Normal Curve Equivalent (NCE) as an aid in aggregating Title I program scores across states and nationwide regardless of…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Achievement Tests, Compensatory Education, Control Groups
Faddis, Bonnie J.; And Others – 1979
Ninth grade Elementary Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Title I evaluation results in reading and English-writing projects were compared, using the RMC Model A with local empirical norms, Model A with national interpolated norms, and Model B. The Comprehensive Tests of Basic Skills (CTBS)--Total Reading and Total Language subtests--were administered…
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Comparative Analysis, Compensatory Education, Control Groups

Weber, Margaret B. – 1976
An application of evaluation methodology to innovative educational programs through a case study of a Chicago suburban high school program for alternative education is presented. The evaluation methodology encompasses the difficulty in combining comparative programs, individual-diagnostic, and individual developmental measures, the selection of…
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Affective Measures, Affective Objectives, Behavioral Objectives