Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 57 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 381 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1103 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3303 |
Descriptor
| Program Evaluation | 13552 |
| Evaluation Methods | 8670 |
| Teaching Methods | 3610 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2975 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1882 |
| Foreign Countries | 1868 |
| Higher Education | 1638 |
| Models | 1531 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1530 |
| Program Development | 1380 |
| Program Implementation | 1038 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 990 |
| Administrators | 410 |
| Teachers | 354 |
| Researchers | 299 |
| Policymakers | 205 |
| Students | 31 |
| Community | 29 |
| Parents | 21 |
| Media Staff | 19 |
| Counselors | 11 |
| Support Staff | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 320 |
| California | 217 |
| Australia | 213 |
| United Kingdom | 178 |
| Illinois | 142 |
| United States | 141 |
| Florida | 139 |
| Texas | 130 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 121 |
| New York | 104 |
| North Carolina | 94 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 15 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 27 |
| Does not meet standards | 17 |
Bortin, Barbara H. – 1977
This paper is addressed to administrators and evaluators in school districts which are initiating bilingual education programs in compliance with a U.S. Supreme Court decision. Major evaluation problems are described and remedies suggested. Each step in the sequence, from needs assessment through final report, is discussed and illustrated. The…
Descriptors: Bilingual Education, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Roecks, Alan L.; Casper, Paul – 1980
The Using Evaluation Data Form (UEDF) represents a psychological lever for getting a program's decision maker to consider major evaluation findings. The form may be used at any point of the evaluation process when sufficient data exist to support a finding deserving of action or reaction by the project staff. By local policy, it is required for…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking, Program Evaluation
Minick, Robert D.; Medlin, Steven M. – Training and Development Journal, 1983
Anticipatory evaluation emphasizes the role of evaluation objectives in planning human resource development programs. In this integrated approach, evaluation begins before the program is designed and continues throughout development and implementation. (SK)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Fogel, Richard Louis – Educational Technology, 1971
This article proposes a conceptual framework for analysis, using some of the ideas embodied in the systems approach, which will enable the investigator to identify the relationships among program operations in a systematic manner, leading to a better understanding of the operations that produce program outputs." (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Systems Analysis
Scott, Ted – Training and Development Journal, 1971
It should be the supervisor, rather than the staff development expert (training expert), who evaluates the results of a company's training program. All too often, changes reported by the staff development officer are not observed by the trainee's supervisor. (AN)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Program Evaluation
Koopman, Peggy – Education Canada, 1971
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
NEA Res Bull, 1970
A project that sends selected public school teachers to work in Job Corps centers is described. (CK)
Descriptors: Educational Programs, Program Evaluation, Teaching Methods
Ball, Samuel; Bogatz, Gerry A. – Educ Telev, 1970
"The problems of pre-testing the impact of this successful series." (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Regional Cooperation
Peer reviewedGreene, Jennifer C.; Caracelli, Valerie J. – New Directions for Evaluation, 1997
Three primary stances on the wisdom of mixing evaluation models while mixing evaluation methods frame the challenges to defensible mixed-method evaluative inquiry. These challenges are addressed by shifting the mixed-method controversy from models toward other critical features of disparate traditions of inquiry. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Definitions, Evaluation Methods, Models, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWeiss, Carol H. – Evaluation Review, 1997
Explores the problems of theory-based evaluation, describes the nature of potential benefits, and suggests that the benefits are significant enough to warrant continued effort to overcome the obstacles and advance its use. Many of the problems are related to inadequate theories about pathways to desired program outcomes. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedHerrell, James M., Ed.; Straw, Roger B., Ed. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2002
The seven articles in this issue represent an approach to multisite evaluation that has much in common with the tradition of clinical trials. However, this approach shares with cluster evaluation an appreciation for the adjustments that are necessary to reflect the realities of conducting evaluation research in actual service settings. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedMorris, Daniel – Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2002
Examines the theoretical foundations of the belief that stakeholder involvement empowers the stakeholders and increases evaluation utilization and the validity of the evaluation. Discusses conditions under which these benefits are realized and situations in which they are not. (SLD)
Descriptors: Empowerment, Evaluation Methods, Participation, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedDonaldson, Stewart I.; Gooler, Laura E.; Scriven, Michael – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Discusses the sources and signs of excessive evaluation anxiety in program evaluation and provides some strategies to help evaluators prevent and manage this common problem. Shows how more than technical skills are required to conduct high quality program evaluation. (SLD)
Descriptors: Anxiety, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedMcConney, Andrew; Rudd, Andy; Ayres, Robert – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Proposes a method for synthesizing findings within mixed-method program evaluations. The proposed method uses a set of criteria and analytic techniques to assess the worth of each data source or type and to establish what each says about program effect. Once data are on a common scale, simple mathematics allows synthesis across data sources or…
Descriptors: Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Synthesis
Peer reviewedHanes, John C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Describes the number needed to treat (NNT) as an indicator of a program's efficacy. L'Abbe plots compare several programs in terms of the event rates that constitute the NNTs. Explains how an evaluator may extend the NNT concept by calculating and plotting event rates on a continuous ordinal basis. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Nonparametric Statistics, Program Evaluation


