Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 61 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 385 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1107 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3307 |
Descriptor
| Program Evaluation | 13556 |
| Evaluation Methods | 8670 |
| Teaching Methods | 3613 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2975 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1882 |
| Foreign Countries | 1872 |
| Higher Education | 1638 |
| Models | 1532 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1530 |
| Program Development | 1381 |
| Program Implementation | 1040 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 990 |
| Administrators | 410 |
| Teachers | 354 |
| Researchers | 299 |
| Policymakers | 205 |
| Students | 31 |
| Community | 29 |
| Parents | 21 |
| Media Staff | 19 |
| Counselors | 11 |
| Support Staff | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 321 |
| California | 217 |
| Australia | 214 |
| United Kingdom | 178 |
| Illinois | 142 |
| United States | 142 |
| Florida | 139 |
| Texas | 130 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 121 |
| New York | 104 |
| North Carolina | 94 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 15 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 27 |
| Does not meet standards | 17 |
Peer reviewedArnold, Mary E. – Journal of Extension, 2002
Using logic modeling as the basis for meaningful evaluation, specific steps are outlined for measuring learning outcomes in extension education: articulating outcomes, turning outcomes into knowledge statements, and constructing a tool to measure perceived changes in knowledge. Use of this learning assessment tool enables extension faculty to…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Extension Education, Logic, Models
Bringle, Robert G.; Hatcher, Julie; Hamilton, Sharon; Young, Peter – Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 2001
Presents two methods for assessing the scholarship of engagement at the institutional level: (1) Comprehensive Assessment of the Scholarship of Engagement (CASE), a systematic method that compiles information about service learning and community engagement, identifies campus strengths, and prioritizes planning areas; and (2) an institutional…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Program Evaluation, School Community Relationship
Peer reviewedBloom, Howard S.; Bos, Johannes M.; Lee, Suk-Won – Evaluation Review, 1999
Explores the possibility of randomly assigning groups (or clusters) of individuals to a program or control group to estimate the impact of programs designed to affect whole groups. Applies the cluster-assignment approach to the evaluation of education programs targeting whole schools. Discusses statistical implications of the method. (SLD)
Descriptors: Cluster Analysis, Control Groups, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewedTelfair, Joseph – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Discusses ways in which a community-based program evaluation can be enhanced by using a screening tool to delineate the program's evaluative needs, resources, and commitments. Describes use of the Evaluation Pre-Screening Tool and reports on some examples of successful use. (SLD)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Evaluators
Peer reviewedBicknell, Rhode Yolanda Crago Alvarez; Telfair, Joseph – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Describes the efforts of one community to define, begin, and finally, embrace community evaluation in the evaluation of a Smart Start program in Cumberland, North Carolina. Lists lessons learned in "selling" the evaluation to the community. (SLD)
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedWandersman, Abraham – New Directions for Evaluation, 1999
Proposes a framework for the evaluation of health and human services programs in community settings. Applies this framework to the discussions in this special issue to see how well the chapters advance community-based program evaluation. Concludes that the chapters are valuable for those interested in improving the evaluation of community-based…
Descriptors: Community Programs, Evaluation Methods, Health Programs, Human Services
Peer reviewedScheirer, M. A.; Newcomer, K. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 2001
Draws on interviews with 61 officials in 13 federal agencies to illustrate a framework showing many of the potential uses of evaluation in support of performance management. Suggests 10 actions as opportunities for agency administrators and evaluators to bridge the current gaps between potential and actual uses of evaluation. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: Administration, Administrators, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization
Peer reviewedHashim, Junaidah – Journal of European Industrial Training, 2001
A study was conducted of 262 training providers in Malaysia, where providers must be government approved. Government regulation, client demands for high quality, and an economic downturn that focused attention on training costs have all influenced evaluation in a positive direction. (SK)
Descriptors: Economic Factors, Evaluation Methods, Federal Regulation, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewedYadapadithaya, P. S. – International Journal of Training and Development, 2001
Responses from 127 private, 99 public, and 26 multinational corporations in India described current practices for evaluating training and development. High pressure for innovation and productivity drives training. The effectiveness of training components is the key factor measured. Participant reactions are the primary data source. Lack of…
Descriptors: Corporate Education, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Program Evaluation
Wilford, Sara – Early Childhood Today, 2005
In this article, the author gives steps on evaluating programs. The first step is to demystify the concept with the staff. The next step is to clarify the evaluation procedure. Among other things, the author gives ideas on developing an internal evaluation as well as setting program goals.
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Early Childhood Education, Evaluation Methods, Goal Orientation
Miller, Thomas I.; Kobayashi, Michelle M.; Noble, Paula M. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2006
Community-based organizations (CBOs), typically small and underfunded with transient staff members, are told by funders to care for clients and verify program value. To assist CBOs with evaluations that speak to program effectiveness, many funders wish to expand the evaluation capacity of CBO staff members so that evaluation will occur as long as…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Community Organizations, Program Effectiveness, Models
Hill, Laura Griner; Betz, Drew L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2005
The purpose of the present study was to examine a common practice in some areas of program evaluation, the retrospective pretest, and to present recommendations regarding its use. The authors review literature to emphasize first, that bias is likely in both prospective and retrospective ratings, and second, that under some circumstances,…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Family Programs, Effect Size, Pretesting
Alkin, Marvin C.; Christie, Christina A.; Greene, Jennifer C.; Henry, Gary T.; Donaldson, Stewart I.; King, Jean A. – New Directions for Evaluation, 2005
The editors give each of the theorists a chance to respond to questions posed about the context of the situation in relation to their own experience in the field, exploring how the exercise had an impact on their evaluation designs.
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Context Effect, Evaluators
Cohen, Stepehn L. – Performance Improvement, 2005
Although the need for evaluation of training programs administered in organizations is recognized and widely discussed, program evaluation is not easy, and there exists a gap between discussion and practice. Cohen notes an absence of research efforts demonstrating the application of evaluation methods, particularly within control groups. This…
Descriptors: Research Design, Program Evaluation, Control Groups, Evaluation Methods
Klein, Alyson – Education Week, 2006
This article describes the educators mixed reviews regarding the audit system planned by the College Board to scrutinize high school Advanced Placement courses. Teachers of AP courses are required to submit materials to the College Board proving that their course syllabuses meet the program's curricular requirements. It is the most extensive…
Descriptors: Advanced Placement Programs, Audits (Verification), Organizations (Groups), Program Evaluation

Direct link
