Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 61 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 385 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1107 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 3307 |
Descriptor
| Program Evaluation | 13556 |
| Evaluation Methods | 8670 |
| Teaching Methods | 3613 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2975 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1882 |
| Foreign Countries | 1872 |
| Higher Education | 1638 |
| Models | 1532 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1530 |
| Program Development | 1381 |
| Program Implementation | 1040 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 990 |
| Administrators | 410 |
| Teachers | 354 |
| Researchers | 299 |
| Policymakers | 205 |
| Students | 31 |
| Community | 29 |
| Parents | 21 |
| Media Staff | 19 |
| Counselors | 11 |
| Support Staff | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Location
| Canada | 321 |
| California | 217 |
| Australia | 214 |
| United Kingdom | 178 |
| Illinois | 142 |
| United States | 142 |
| Florida | 139 |
| Texas | 130 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 121 |
| New York | 104 |
| North Carolina | 94 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 15 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 27 |
| Does not meet standards | 17 |
Industrial Arts and Vocational Education, 1972
Results of a survey to determine what vocational industrial education consider to be the most important qualities of their programs. (GB)
Descriptors: Mass Production, Program Evaluation, Simulated Environment, Student Motivation
Peer reviewedBond, Charles A. – College English, 1972
Described is a study designed to test on a scientific basis the effectiveness of Dr. Francis Christensen's program for teaching composition. (RY)
Descriptors: College Freshmen, Control Groups, Experimental Programs, Pretesting
Peer reviewedUhlhorn, Kenneth W.; And Others – School Science and Mathematics, 1971
Preservice teachers' success in a science lesson presentation was not significantly influenced by the number of science courses taken previously, the science topic chosen, or grade level selected for the presentation. (CP)
Descriptors: College Science, Elementary Education, Evaluation, Methods Courses
Babbs, Lynda F. – Journal of Business Education, 1970
Descriptors: Class Activities, Educational Experiments, Elementary School Students, Individual Differences
Peer reviewedShuman, R. Baird – Modern Language Journal, 1971
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Language Enrollment, Language Teachers, Modern Languages
Peer reviewedKruger, W. Stanley – Planning and Changing, 1970
Discusses the educational program auditing concept for promoting educational accountability and describes therole of the educational program auditor as the central figure in the application of this new technique. (JF)
Descriptors: Educational Objectives, Educational Quality, Evaluation Methods, Performance Criteria
Jacobson, Harry E. – Balance Sheet, 1970
Descriptors: Business Education, Curriculum Evaluation, Followup Studies, Program Evaluation
Manning, William R. – Educ Leadership, 1969
Descriptors: Cost Effectiveness, Curriculum Development, Decision Making, Educational Finance
Peer reviewedNapier, John – Theory and Research in Social Education, 1982
Describes the development and application of a model for social studies program evaluations. A case study showing how the model's three-step process was used to evaluate the Improving Citizenship Education Project in Fulton County, Georgia is included. (AM)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Citizenship Education, Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer revieweddeVoss, Gary; Hawk, Donald – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1983
The history and characteristics of the dominant evaluation model used in teacher education today, the Western Kentucky or Sandefur model, are described and evidence is offered of widespread anomalies in its usage. A new follow-up model that would permit informed decisions about the professional needs of teachers is proposed. (LC)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Higher Education, Models, Preservice Teacher Education
Peer reviewedvan Slype, Georges – Multilingua, 1982
It is proposed that assessment of human translation versus machine translation programs use methods and criteria that measure efficiency and cost effectiveness and are efficient and cost-effective in themselves. A variety of methods and criteria are evaluated and discussed. (MSE)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Cost Effectiveness, Efficiency, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewedHeath, Robert W.; Brandon, Paul R. – Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1982
This paper discusses problems associated with the application of experimental methods to program evaluation, proposes an alternative approach (program-attribute scaling), and reports the procedure and results of a trial application of the alternative approach. (Author)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Mathematical Models, Observation
Peer reviewedHenderson, Thomas H.; And Others – Studies in Educational Evaluation, 1983
This paper explores the implications of "user-focused evaluation" by examining the information utilization dynamics of the evaluation of the Caribbean Agricultural Extension Project. (BW)
Descriptors: Agricultural Education, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Extension Education
Peer reviewedBergquist, Constance C. – Exceptional Children, 1982
Criterion-referenced tests in a time-series design were found to be the most feasible methodology for evaluating placement in an early intervention program for mildly retarded, learning disabled, and emotionally disturbed children. Advantages included provision of longitudinal data, while the major disadvantage was administration time. (CL)
Descriptors: Criterion Referenced Tests, Emotional Disturbances, Evaluation Methods, Learning Disabilities
Ball, Samuel – Contemporary Education Review, 1982
In reacting to five recent books on program evaluation, eight evaluation perils are discussed: poor preparation of evaluations, programs with unrealistic goals, the mix-up of models, interpersonal conflicts, the morass of measurement, answering evaluation questions, the secondary evaluator as sniper, and hostility from program staff. (CM)
Descriptors: Book Reviews, Educational Objectives, Evaluation Methods, Evaluators


