NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)0
Since 2006 (last 20 years)5
Audience
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Giles, Bethany A. – ProQuest LLC, 2013
This study examined the accountability of selected state departments of education on how they implemented, monitored, and evaluated Supplemental Education Services (SES). No Child Left Behind (NCLB) requires low-performing Title I schools to use federal funds to extend the school day for at-risk children by providing SES afterschool programs. This…
Descriptors: State Departments of Education, Accountability, Program Implementation, Progress Monitoring
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Barley, Zoe A.; Wegner, Sandra – Journal of Research in Rural Education, 2010
Under the No Child Left Behind Act schools that fail to make progress in having students reach proficiency are designated in "need of improvement." If this continues, schools that receive federal Title I funds are required to offer their low income students supplemental educational services (SES) such as tutoring outside of school time.…
Descriptors: Supplementary Education, Rural Schools, Public Schools, Eligibility
Gill, Brian; McCombs, Jennifer Sloan; Naftel, Scott; Ross, Karen; Song, Mengli; Harmon, Jennifer; Vernez, Georges – US Department of Education, 2008
This report presents findings on the implementation of parental choice options from the first year of the National Longitudinal Study of "No Child Left Behind" (NLS-"NCLB") and the Study of State Implementation of Accountability and Teacher Quality Under "No Child Left Behind" (SSI-"NCLB"). The report uses…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Legislation, School Choice, Supplementary Education
Christensen, Brad D. – ProQuest LLC, 2009
With reports alleging a sharp decline in student achievement in the last several years, there has been a call for higher standards in the United States education system. In response, with bipartisan support, politicians overwhelmingly passed the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. NCLB, the most recent reauthorization of the Elementary and…
Descriptors: Action Research, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Federal Programs
US Department of Education, 2008
This report highlights key findings from "State and Local Implementation of the "No Child Left Behind Act." Volume IV--Title I School Choice and Supplemental Educational Services: Interim Report." A key aim of the "No Child Left Behind Act of 2001" ("NCLB") is to provide additional educational options to…
Descriptors: Educational Legislation, Federal Legislation, Elementary Secondary Education, School Choice
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Le Tendre, Mary Jean – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1996
Provides detailed examples of the components of Title I as recently revised and suggests alternative ways that the program's new flexibility can be used to enhance school reform. Revised Title I audit procedures are also designed to promote improved program performance and increased understanding of the law. (SLD)
Descriptors: Compensatory Education, Educational Change, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation
Carapella, Ruth; Mertz, Ronald E. – 1980
The St. Louis (Missouri) Public Schools After School program, which was implemented for the first time during the 1979-1980 school year, was designed to provide after school remedial mathematics and reading instruction to students in grades 1 to 8 who could not be serviced during the school day due to lack of space or program availability. Factors…
Descriptors: After School Programs, Compensatory Education, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Education
Vitullo-Martin, Thomas – 1979
This study examined the delivery of Elementary and Secondary Education Act Title I services to private schools through an analysis of a national survey of Title I programs, an examination of the implementation of the program in 50 school districts and by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and a review of the monitoring efforts of 41 state education…
Descriptors: American Indians, Economically Disadvantaged, Educationally Disadvantaged, Elementary Secondary Education