Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Demonstration Programs | 3 |
Program Implementation | 3 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Program Evaluation | 2 |
Administrators | 1 |
Adults | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Data Collection | 1 |
Developmental Disabilities | 1 |
Employment Programs | 1 |
Ethics | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
American Journal of Evaluation | 3 |
Author
Barth, Michael C. | 1 |
Carman, Joanne G. | 1 |
Deegan, Michael | 1 |
Fredericks, Kimberly A. | 1 |
Hamilton, Gayle | 1 |
Hoggart, Lesley | 1 |
Walker, Robert | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Fredericks, Kimberly A.; Deegan, Michael; Carman, Joanne G. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Evaluators are often faced with many challenges in the design and implementation of a program's evaluation. Because programs are entangled in complex networks of structures and stakeholders, they can be challenging to understand, and they often pose issues of competing and conflicting goals. However, by using a systems mapping approach to…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Demonstration Programs, Developmental Disabilities, Systems Approach
Walker, Robert; Hoggart, Lesley; Hamilton, Gayle – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
Although random assignment is generally the preferred methodology in impact evaluations, it raises numerous ethical concerns, some of which are addressed by securing participants' informed consent. However, there has been little investigation of how consent is obtained in social experiments and the amount of information that can be conveyed--and…
Descriptors: Employment Programs, Foreign Countries, Case Studies, Program Evaluation
Barth, Michael C. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2004
Demonstration programs and social experiments are often subject to sophisticated, controlled evaluations. An important factor that is not subject to control, and sometimes even goes unobserved, is overall program site quality. Site quality can be observed in process evaluations, but these tend to be expensive. This paper describes an alternative…
Descriptors: Program Implementation, Demonstration Programs, Site Selection, Site Analysis