Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Critical Path Method | 3 |
Formative Evaluation | 3 |
Program Implementation | 3 |
Program Design | 2 |
Program Development | 2 |
Case Method (Teaching… | 1 |
Change Strategies | 1 |
Community Education | 1 |
Computer Assisted Design | 1 |
Engineering Education | 1 |
Family Literacy | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Coppit, David | 1 |
Longwell-Grice, Hope | 1 |
Matney, Malinda M. | 1 |
McIntyre, Ellen | 1 |
Taylor, Simone Himbeault | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Michigan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Taylor, Simone Himbeault; Matney, Malinda M. – Planning for Higher Education, 2007
The Division of Student Affairs at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor engaged in an iterative strategic process to create and implement a set of long-range goals. This strategic journey continues to evolve, uniting a guiding framework of strategic planning steps, a reflective process with an assessment component within each step, and a group…
Descriptors: Strategic Planning, Organizational Change, Student Personnel Services, Organizational Development
Longwell-Grice, Hope; McIntyre, Ellen – School Community Journal, 2006
For educators interested in engaging in critical literacy work with families and schools, the efforts can be both exhilarating and exasperating. Reflecting on a two-year family literacy project, we consider the possibilities and pitfalls of the projects' design and implementation. The work described in this article takes a stance that is both…
Descriptors: Family Literacy, Formative Evaluation, Community Education, Critical Path Method
Coppit, David – Computer Science Education, 2006
In software engineering education, large projects are widely recognized as a useful way of exposing students to the real-world difficulties of team software development. But large projects are difficult to put into practice. First, educators rarely have additional time to manage software projects. Second, classrooms have inherent limitations that…
Descriptors: Engineering Education, Teaching Methods, Organization Size (Groups), Critical Path Method