Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Intervention | 3 |
| Meta Analysis | 3 |
| Program Length | 3 |
| Control Groups | 2 |
| Effect Size | 2 |
| Program Effectiveness | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Achievement Tests | 1 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Age Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Review of Educational Research | 3 |
Author
| Bangert-Drowns, Robert L. | 1 |
| Donker, Anouk S. | 1 |
| Schlaefli, Andre | 1 |
| de Boer, Hester | 1 |
| van der Werf, Margaretha P. C. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 3 |
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Defining Issues Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkde Boer, Hester; Donker, Anouk S.; van der Werf, Margaretha P. C. – Review of Educational Research, 2014
This meta-analysis examined the influence of attributes related to the implementation of learning strategy instruction interventions on students' academic performance, and also examined how the attributes related to the method of testing the intervention effects affected the actual effects measured. Using metaregression, we analyzed the…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Intervention, Academic Achievement, Learning Strategies
Peer reviewedBangert-Drowns, Robert L.; And Others – Review of Educational Research, 1983
Results from a meta-analysis of findings on the effectiveness of coaching for achievement tests from 30 controlled studies of coaching programs are presented. Coaching typically raised achievement test scores by .25 standard deviations. Effects varied with the level of training intervention. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Achievement Gains, Achievement Tests, Control Groups, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedSchlaefli, Andre; And Others – Review of Educational Research, 1985
Fifty-five studies of a variety of education interventions designed to stimulate development in moral judgment, which used the Defining Issues Test, are reviewed. Results are discussed in terms of general treatment effects, program type, exposure to Kohlberg's Theory, subject age, and treatment duration. (Author/BS)
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Attitude Measures, Effect Size
