Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Programming | 2 |
| Artificial Intelligence | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| Coding | 1 |
| Computer Science Education | 1 |
| Creativity | 1 |
| Data | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Intelligent Tutoring Systems | 1 |
| Measurement Techniques | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Paaßen, Benjamin | 2 |
| Gal, Kobi | 1 |
| Hammer, Barbara | 1 |
| Jensen, Joris | 1 |
| Kovalkov, Anastasia | 1 |
| Pinkwart, Niels | 1 |
| Segal, Avi | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKovalkov, Anastasia; Paaßen, Benjamin; Segal, Avi; Pinkwart, Niels; Gal, Kobi – IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2021
Promoting creativity is considered an important goal of education, but creativity is notoriously hard to measure. In this article, we make the journey from defining a formal measure of creativity, that is, efficiently computable to applying the measure in a practical domain. The measure is general and relies on core theoretical concepts in…
Descriptors: Creativity, Programming, Measurement Techniques, Models
Download full textPaaßen, Benjamin; Jensen, Joris; Hammer, Barbara – International Educational Data Mining Society, 2016
The first intelligent tutoring systems for computer programming have been proposed more than 30 years ago, mostly focusing on well defined programming tasks e.g. in the context of logic programming. Recent systems also teach complex programs, where explicit modelling of every possible program and mistake is no longer possible. Such systems are…
Descriptors: Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Programming, Computer Science Education, Data
