Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 5 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 8 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 10 |
Descriptor
Source
Remedial and Special Education | 10 |
Author
Al Otaiba, Stephanie | 1 |
Allor, Jill H. | 1 |
Alonzo, Julie | 1 |
Blackorby, Jose | 1 |
Bundock, Kaitlin | 1 |
Cheatham, Jennifer P. | 1 |
Chow, Jason C. | 1 |
Collin Shepley | 1 |
David A. Klingbeil | 1 |
David C. Parker | 1 |
Devin Graley | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 10 |
Reports - Research | 9 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 5 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Middle Schools | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Intermediate Grades | 1 |
Junior High Schools | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Collin Shepley; Justin D. Lane; Devin Graley – Remedial and Special Education, 2023
This study serves as an initial attempt to establish content validity for graphs likely to be included in trainings targeting progress monitoring for professionals serving learners with or at risk for disabilities. We created a survey containing 32 graphic displays of hypothetical learner data. These surveys were administered to a sample of…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Students with Disabilities, Content Validity, Graphs
Gretchen Scheibel; Tyler A. Hicks; Kathleen N. Zimmerman; Jesse R. Pace – Remedial and Special Education, 2024
Intensive interventions are time- and resource-demanding interventions designed to be implemented with a single student with unique learning needs. Economic evaluation provides a methodology for evaluating the time and material resource costs of implementing these interventions to provide detailed feasibility information for educators considering…
Descriptors: Intervention, Cost Effectiveness, Teacher Attitudes, Time on Task
Hampton, Lauren H.; Chow, Jason C. – Remedial and Special Education, 2022
Special educators serve a diverse population of students with unique strengths and needs, and adaptive interventions that account for individual differences before and during the intervention are an important tool to moving the field toward more individualized practices. The purpose of this article is to detail the conceptualization and…
Descriptors: Special Education, Students with Disabilities, Intervention, Individual Differences
Van Norman, Ethan R.; Klingbeil, David A.; McLendon, Katherine E. – Remedial and Special Education, 2019
Researchers and practitioners frequently use curriculum-based measures of reading (CBM-R) within single-case design (SCD) frameworks to evaluate the effects of reading interventions with individual students. Effect sizes (ESs) developed specifically for SCDs are often used as a supplement to visual analysis to gauge treatment effects. The degree…
Descriptors: Oral Reading, Error of Measurement, Progress Monitoring, Effect Size
Reed, Deborah K.; Meginnis, Tracy; Park, Seohee; Gibbs, Anna – Remedial and Special Education, 2023
This study sought to better understand how schools were addressing U.S. state policies targeting summer reading interventions for students not meeting accountability standards. Survey data were gathered from 580 public and private elementary schools in one state (67% response rate) regarding the barriers to offering summer programs,…
Descriptors: Elementary Schools, Summer Programs, Reading Programs, Intervention
Ethan R. Van Norman; David A. Klingbeil; Kirsten Truman; Peter M. Nelson; David C. Parker – Remedial and Special Education, 2024
The transition from sounding out unfamiliar words to effortlessly reading connected text does not occur all at once or at the same rate for students. The purpose of this study was to explore the accuracy of three decision rules (data point, median, and trend line) applied to progress monitoring outcomes of alphabetic principle (nonsense word…
Descriptors: Progress Monitoring, Outcomes of Education, Reading Rate, Word Recognition
O'Keeffe, Breda V.; Bundock, Kaitlin; Kladis, Kristin L.; Yan, Rui; Nelson, Kat – Remedial and Special Education, 2017
Previous research on curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency (CBM ORF) found high levels of variability around the estimates of students' fluency; however, little research has studied the issue of variability specifically with well-designed passage sets and a sample of students who scored below benchmark for the purpose of progress…
Descriptors: Emergent Literacy, Elementary School Students, Reading Fluency, Reading Tests
Tindal, Gerald; Nese, Joseph F. T.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Alonzo, Julie – Remedial and Special Education, 2016
For 30 years, researchers have investigated oral reading fluency as a measure of growth in reading proficiency. Yet, little research has been done with these measures in the context of progress monitoring in Tier 2 systems. First, we document teachers' progress-monitoring decisions on type of passage (on-grade or off-grade) and how often to…
Descriptors: Reading Fluency, Oral Reading, Reading Skills, Measures (Individuals)
Allor, Jill H.; Gifford, Diane B.; Al Otaiba, Stephanie; Miller, Saralyn J.; Cheatham, Jennifer P. – Remedial and Special Education, 2013
This multiple baseline study investigated the effectiveness of text-based reading lessons for students with intellectual disability (ID). Three students were selected who had not responded well to explicit and systematic reading instruction. They were provided with individual instruction in daily 45-min sessions for 14 weeks (approximately 70…
Descriptors: Mental Retardation, Reading Skills, Reading Instruction, Individual Instruction
Wei, Xin; Lenz, Keith B.; Blackorby, Jose – Remedial and Special Education, 2013
This study examined math growth trajectories by disability category, gender, race, and socioeconomic status using a nationally representative sample of students ages 7 to 17. The students represented 11 federal disability categories. Compared with the national norming sample, students in all 11 disability categories had lower math achievement…
Descriptors: Socioeconomic Status, Age Differences, Gender Differences, Racial Differences