Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Protocol Analysis | 3 |
Undergraduate Students | 3 |
Reading Processes | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Coding | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Convergent Thinking | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Creative Thinking | 1 |
Cues | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Discourse Processes: A… | 3 |
Author
Burkett, Candice | 1 |
Butterfuss, Reese | 1 |
Gerrig, Richard J. | 1 |
Goldman, Susan R. | 1 |
Kendeou, Panayiota | 1 |
Trevors, Gregory J. | 1 |
Wenzel, William G. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
New York | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Trevors, Gregory J.; Kendeou, Panayiota; Butterfuss, Reese – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2017
In recent years, a number of insights have been gained into the cognitive processes that explain how individuals overcome misconceptions and revise their previously acquired incorrect knowledge. The current study complements this line of research by investigating the moment-by-moment emotion processes that occur during knowledge revision using a…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Misconceptions, Emotional Response, Protocol Analysis
Wenzel, William G.; Gerrig, Richard J. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2015
This project demonstrates how narrative mysteries provide a context in which readers engage in creative cognition. Drawing on the concepts of convergent and divergent thinking, we wrote stories that had either convergent or divergent outcomes. For example, one story had a character give his girlfriend a ring (a convergent outcome), whereas the…
Descriptors: Convergent Thinking, Creative Thinking, Story Reading, Protocol Analysis
Burkett, Candice; Goldman, Susan R. – Discourse Processes: A multidisciplinary journal, 2016
Comparisons of literary experts and novices indicate that experts engage in interpretive processes to "get the point" during their reading of literary texts but novices do not. In two studies the reading and interpretive processes of literary novices (undergraduates with no formal training in literature study) were elicited through…
Descriptors: Literature, Novices, Undergraduate Students, Protocol Analysis