Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Psycholinguistics | 7 |
Language Processing | 6 |
Sentence Structure | 4 |
Grammar | 3 |
Language Research | 3 |
Linguistic Theory | 3 |
Phrase Structure | 3 |
Syntax | 3 |
Form Classes (Languages) | 2 |
Models | 2 |
Morphemes | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Frazier, Lyn | 7 |
Clifton, Charles, Jr. | 3 |
Fodor, Janet Dean | 1 |
Kaup, Barbara | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 4 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Clifton, Charles, Jr.; Frazier, Lyn; Kaup, Barbara – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2021
We propose that negative clauses are generally interpreted as if the affirmative portion of the clause is under discussion, a likely topic. This predicts a preference for affirmative (topical) antecedents over negative antecedents of a following missing verb phrase (VP). Three experiments tested the predictions of this hypothesis in sentences…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Phrase Structure, Psycholinguistics, Ambiguity (Semantics)
Frazier, Lyn – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2015
It is proposed that humans have available to them two systems for interpreting natural language. One system is familiar from formal semantics. It is a type based system that pairs a syntactic form with its interpretation using grammatical rules of composition. This system delivers both plausible and implausible meanings. The other proposed system…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Psycholinguistics, Linguistic Input, Semantics
Frazier, Lyn – Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2015
Native speakers of English regularly hear sentences without overt subjects. Nevertheless, they maintain a [[superscript -]pro] grammar that requires sentences to have an overt subject. It is proposed that listeners of English recognize that speakers reduce predictable material and thus attribute null subjects to this process, rather than changing…
Descriptors: English, Psycholinguistics, Sentence Structure, Grammar

Frazier, Lyn; Fodor, Janet Dean – Cognition, 1978
The human sentence parsing device assigns phrase structure to sentences in two steps. The first stage parser assigns lexical and phrasal nodes to substrings of words. The second stage parser then adds higher nodes to link these phrasal packages together into a complete phrase marker. This model is compared with others. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Language Processing, Linguistic Theory, Models, Phrase Structure

Frazier, Lyn; Clifton, Charles, Jr. – Language and Cognitive Processes, 1998
Two experiments and two questionnaire studies investigated the processing of sluiced sentences among college student participants. Results show that, because the interpretation of a sluiced constituent takes place at the representational level of logical form (LF), implicit arguments are not made explicit at LF, but focus is important in the…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, College Students, Higher Education, Inferences
Clifton, Charles, Jr.; Frazier, Lyn – 1980
This report describes part of a longer study on sentence comprehension. The long range goal is to identify distinct levels of processing in terms of the types of linguistic and extralinguistic information each level uses. The focus of this part of the study is sentences with filler-gap relations, such as, "This is the girl the teacher wanted to…
Descriptors: Language Processing, Language Research, Listening Comprehension, Psycholinguistics
Frazier, Lyn – 1977
The model of sentence perception proposed by Fodor, Bever and Garrett (1974) emphasizes the importance of grammatical cues signalling clause boundaries, and suggests that segmentation of a sentence into clauses precedes computation of the internal structure of those clauses. However, this model has nothing to say about the many sentences in which…
Descriptors: Ambiguity, Grammar, Language Processing, Language Research