Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Counseling Psychology | 3 |
Psychological Evaluation | 3 |
Decision Making | 2 |
Meta Analysis | 2 |
Statistical Analysis | 2 |
Behavior | 1 |
Case Studies | 1 |
Clinical Diagnosis | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Construct Validity | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Counseling Psychologist | 3 |
Author
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Spengler, Paul M.; White, Michael J.; Aegisdottir, Stefania; Maugherman, Alan S. – Counseling Psychologist, 2009
The reactions by Ridley and Shaw-Ridley (EJ832451) and Lichtenberg (EJ832452) to the authors' meta-analysis on the effects of experience on judgment accuracy add positively to what is hoped will become an ever more focused discourse on this most basic question: How can mental health clinical decision making be improved? In this rejoinder, the…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Psychological Evaluation, Construct Validity, Counseling Psychology
Aegisdottir, Stefania; White, Michael J.; Spengler, Paul M.; Maugherman, Alan S.; Anderson, Linda A.; Cook, Robert S.; Nichols, Cassandra N.; Lampropoulos, Georgios K.; Walker, Blain S.; Cohen, Genna; Rush, Jeffrey D. – Counseling Psychologist, 2006
Clinical predictions made by mental health practitioners are compared with those using statistical approaches. Sixty-seven studies were identified from a comprehensive search of 56 years of research; 92 effect sizes were derived from these studies. The overall effect of clinical versus statistical prediction showed a somewhat greater accuracy for…
Descriptors: Counseling Psychology, Effect Size, Meta Analysis, Psychological Evaluation
Aegisdottir, Stefania; Spengler, Paul M.; White, Michael J. – Counseling Psychologist, 2006
In this rejoinder, the authors respond to the insightful commentary of Strohmer and Arm, Chwalisz, and Hilton, Harris, and Rice about the meta-analysis on statistical versus clinical prediction techniques for mental health judgments. The authors address issues including the availability of statistical prediction techniques for real-life psychology…
Descriptors: Meta Analysis, Mental Health, Prognostic Tests, Psychological Evaluation