Descriptor
| Psychological Studies | 4 |
| Research Methodology | 3 |
| Tables (Data) | 3 |
| Correlation | 2 |
| Intelligence Tests | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Age | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Clinical Psychology | 1 |
| Developmental Psychology | 1 |
| Disadvantaged | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bloom, Allan S. | 1 |
| Davis, Everett E. | 1 |
| Dube, Gary G. | 1 |
| Harper, D. C. | 1 |
| Rowland, Terrence | 1 |
| Rudolph, Jeffrey A. | 1 |
| Tanners, H. | 1 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Binet Intelligence… | 4 |
| McCarthy Scales of Childrens… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHarper, D. C.; Tanners, H. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1974
The major purpose of this investigation was to assess the concurrent validity of the French Pictorial Test of Intelligence with the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, Form L-M in a moderate to severly physically disabled sample of children. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Methods, Physical Disabilities, Psychological Studies
Peer reviewedDavis, Everett E.; Rowland, Terrence – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1974
This study was designed to assess the comparility of the McCarthy and Binet tests. (Author)
Descriptors: Correlation, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Psychological Studies
Peer reviewedBloom, Allan S.; And Others – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1977
The purpose of this research was to expand the criteria for the efficacy of the three short forms of the Standford-Binet Intelligence Scale to a consideration of individual differences in intelligence classification. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Children, Developmental Psychology, Intelligence Quotient, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewedDube, Gary G.; Rudolph, Jeffrey A. – Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1978
Assesses the concurrent validity of the Vane Kindergarten Test with low socioeconomic status black preschool children with the Stanford-Binet as the external criterion. Also examines its feasibility with children below the age of 4 1/2. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Age, Clinical Psychology, Disadvantaged, Intelligence Tests
