Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Program Validation | 3 |
Psychometrics | 3 |
Comparative Testing | 2 |
Investigations | 2 |
Item Analysis | 2 |
Academic Achievement | 1 |
Achievement Rating | 1 |
Computer Simulation | 1 |
Construct Validity | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Cutting Scores | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 3 |
Author
Donnellan, M. Brent | 1 |
Gilpin, Andrew R. | 1 |
Koskey, Kristin L. K. | 1 |
Sondergeld, Toni A. | 1 |
Stone, Gregory Ethan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Adult Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Stone, Gregory Ethan; Koskey, Kristin L. K.; Sondergeld, Toni A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2011
Typical validation studies on standard setting models, most notably the Angoff and modified Angoff models, have ignored construct development, a critical aspect associated with all conceptualizations of measurement processes. Stone compared the Angoff and objective standard setting (OSS) models and found that Angoff failed to define a legitimate…
Descriptors: Cutting Scores, Standard Setting (Scoring), Models, Construct Validity
Gilpin, Andrew R. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
Rosenthal and Rubin introduced a general effect size index, r[subscript equivalent], for use in meta-analyses of two-group experiments; it employs p values from reports of the original studies to determine an equivalent t test and the corresponding point-biserial correlation coefficient. The present investigation used Monte Carlo-simulated…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Correlation, Meta Analysis, Monte Carlo Methods
Donnellan, M. Brent – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2008
The properties of the achievement goal inventories developed by Grant and Dweck (2003) and Elliot and McGregor (2001) were evaluated in two studies with a total of 780 participants. A four-factor specification for the Grant and Dweck inventory did not closely replicate results published in their original report. In contrast, the structure of the…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Psychometrics, Program Validation, Achievement Rating