Descriptor
Public Opinion | 6 |
Females | 5 |
Feminism | 4 |
Social Science Research | 3 |
Attitude Change | 2 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Content Analysis | 2 |
Mass Media Effects | 2 |
Media Research | 2 |
Politics | 2 |
Sex Stereotypes | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Social Science Quarterly | 2 |
Author
Smith, Linda Lazier | 2 |
Burris, Val | 1 |
Conover, Pamela Johnston | 1 |
Gecas, Viktor | 1 |
Huber, Joan | 1 |
Spitze, Glenna | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 5 |
Speeches/Meeting Papers | 3 |
Journal Articles | 2 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Washington | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Equal Rights Amendment | 6 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Spitze, Glenna; Huber, Joan – Social Science Quarterly, 1982
Studies the effect of background factors on beliefs about the consequences of the passage of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). What types of people fear or welcome the ERA, what their reasons are, and where they obtain information about its possible consequences are examined. (AM)
Descriptors: Adults, Public Opinion, Social Characteristics, Social Science Research
Smith, Linda Lazier – 1984
A study compared newspaper coverage of the women's suffrage movement in the 1920s with coverage of efforts to pass the Equal Rights Amendment in the 1970s and early 1980s, to see if the similar movements with different outcomes were treated similarly or differently by the press. A content analysis of relevant articles in the "New York…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Females
Conover, Pamela Johnston; And Others – 1981
This paper explores single-issue politics by examining voting patterns on abortion and Equal Rights Amendment (E.R.A.) issues. The concept of single-issue politics refers to any issue which generates a significant amount of single-minded voting and/or political behavior. Major objectives of the study were to consider factors which were likely to…
Descriptors: Abortions, Activism, Attitude Measures, Family Role

Burris, Val – Social Science Quarterly, 1983
Three factors were identified as most important in explaining the nonratification of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA): (1) the low support for the amendment among politically influential groups; (2) the uneven geographic distribution of ERA support; and (3) the association between ERA opposition and a broader right-wing backlash. (Author/RM)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Economic Factors, Females, Feminism
Smith, Linda Lazier – 1984
A study examined the content of direct mail materials, distributed by the National Organization for Women (NOW) and Stop ERA groups, favoring or opposing passage of the Equal Rights Amendment. It was expected that NOW's pieces would concentrate on counteracting or counterattacking Stop ERA's arguments against the amendment (military draft, lesbian…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Comparative Analysis, Content Analysis, Federal Legislation
Gecas, Viktor; And Others – 1977
A study was undertaken in Washington state to investigate voting behavior on the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA), which was approved by Washington state voters in 1972. Specifically, research objectives were to determine who was for or against the ERA, to assess the nature of objections to the ERA, and to consider implications of the ERA for family…
Descriptors: Attitudes, Behavioral Science Research, Civil Rights Legislation, Data Analysis