Descriptor
| Qualitative Research | 4 |
| Research Design | 4 |
| Evaluation Methods | 3 |
| Program Evaluation | 3 |
| Research Methodology | 3 |
| Research Problems | 2 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Data Collection | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evaluation Problems | 1 |
| Experiments | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation and Program… | 4 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Norway | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBednarz, Dan – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1985
Many evaluation researchers are now attempting to synthesize quantitative and qualitative approaches. Although such efforts appear to carry great promise, some subtleties and incompatibilities of these approaches are perhaps being overlooked. Implications for social inquiry are discussed. (Author/GDC)
Descriptors: Data Collection, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Problems, Qualitative Research
Peer reviewedDennis, Michael L.; And Others – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1994
Some specific opportunities and techniques are described for combining and integrating qualitative and quantitative methods from the design stage of a substance abuse program evaluation through implementation and reporting. The multiple problems and requirements of such an evaluation make integrated methods essential. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Integrated Activities, Program Development, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedIsaksen, Arne – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1999
Considers the workings and effects of The Innovation and New Technology Programme in Norway, describing the design of the evaluation and the use of a centrally established control group to assess programs results. Uses results from innovation theory to appraise the aims and working methods of the program and a combination of quantitative and…
Descriptors: Control Groups, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Geographic Regions
Peer reviewedDunford, Franklyn W. – Evaluation and Program Planning, 1990
Seven qualitative issues associated with randomization that have the potential to weaken or destroy otherwise sound experimental designs are reviewed and illustrated via actual field experiments. Issue areas include ethics and legality, liability risks, manipulation of randomized outcomes, hidden bias, design intrusiveness, case flow, and…
Descriptors: Ethics, Experiments, Field Studies, Legal Problems
