Descriptor
| Library Services | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Sampling | 2 |
| Academic Libraries | 1 |
| Accountability | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Hypothesis Testing | 1 |
| Interviews | 1 |
| Library Personnel | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Guides - General | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Practitioners | 2 |
| Researchers | 2 |
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPagell, Ruth A.; Lusk, Edward J. – College and Research Libraries, 1986
Tested the hypothesis that increasing library services would increase returns of a questionnaire generated by that library. Students and faculty were surveyed before and after new services were offered at Wharton School. Results suggest source of sponsorship should be related to user group to be surveyed to maximize return rate. (CDD)
Descriptors: Academic Libraries, College Faculty, Higher Education, Hypothesis Testing
Download full textDervin, Brenda; Clark, Kathleen – 1987
Developed as part of a three-year project funded by the Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA), this manual is designed to present librarians in the State of California with an alternative, "sense-making" approach to assessing the information needs of patrons and potential patrons and to assessing accountability, i.e., whether…
Descriptors: Accountability, Evaluation Methods, Interviews, Library Personnel
