Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Foreign Countries | 2 |
| Protocol Analysis | 2 |
| Questionnaires | 2 |
| Athletes | 1 |
| Cognitive Style | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Content Validity | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Factor Analysis | 1 |
| Factor Structure | 1 |
| High Stakes Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Canada | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHoffmann, Matt D.; Loughead, Todd. M. – Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 2019
Using a multiphase approach, the purpose of the present study was to develop a psychometrically sound questionnaire to measure protégés' perceptions of peer athlete mentoring functions. Phase 1 consisted of three stages: (a) item development, (b) assessment of content validity via think-aloud interviews with peer mentored athletes, and (c)…
Descriptors: Athletes, Mentors, Questionnaires, Test Construction
Baker, Beverly Anne – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2012
Researchers of high-stakes, subjectively scored writing assessments have done much work to better understand the process that raters go through in applying a rating scale to a language performance to arrive at a score. However, there is still unexplained, systematic variability in rater scoring that resists rater training (see Hoyt & Kerns,…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Decision Making, Scoring, High Stakes Tests
