Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Item Response Theory | 2 |
Questionnaires | 2 |
Adaptive Testing | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
Foreign Countries | 1 |
Models | 1 |
Sample Size | 1 |
Simulation | 1 |
Student Motivation | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Applied Psychological… | 2 |
Author
Anderson Koenig, Judith | 1 |
Hol, A. Michiel | 1 |
Mellenbergh, Gideon J. | 1 |
Roberts, James S. | 1 |
Vorst, Harrie C. M. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Anderson Koenig, Judith; Roberts, James S. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2007
Methods for linking item response theory (IRT) parameters are developed for attitude questionnaire responses calibrated with the generalized graded unfolding model (GGUM). One class of IRT linking methods derives the linking coefficients by comparing characteristic curves, and three of these methods---test characteristic curve (TCC), item…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Comparative Analysis, Questionnaires, Sample Size
Hol, A. Michiel; Vorst, Harrie C. M.; Mellenbergh, Gideon J. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2007
In a randomized experiment (n = 515), a computerized and a computerized adaptive test (CAT) are compared. The item pool consists of 24 polytomous motivation items. Although items are carefully selected, calibration data show that Samejima's graded response model did not fit the data optimally. A simulation study is done to assess possible…
Descriptors: Student Motivation, Simulation, Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing