Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Psychometrics | 3 |
Questionnaires | 3 |
Comparative Analysis | 2 |
Evaluation Methods | 2 |
Scores | 2 |
Behavioral Science Research | 1 |
Benchmarking | 1 |
Data | 1 |
Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
Experimenter Characteristics | 1 |
Factor Structure | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Multivariate Behavioral… | 3 |
Author
Sijtsma, Klaas | 2 |
Helmes, Edward | 1 |
Van Der Ark, L. Andries | 1 |
Zijlstra, Wobbe P. | 1 |
van Ginkel, Joost R. | 1 |
van der Ark, L. Andries | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Eysenck Personality Inventory | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
van Ginkel, Joost R.; van der Ark, L. Andries; Sijtsma, Klaas – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
The performance of five simple multiple imputation methods for dealing with missing data were compared. In addition, random imputation and multivariate normal imputation were used as lower and upper benchmark, respectively. Test data were simulated and item scores were deleted such that they were either missing completely at random, missing at…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Psychometrics, Item Response Theory, Scores
Zijlstra, Wobbe P.; Van Der Ark, L. Andries; Sijtsma, Klaas – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2007
Classical methods for detecting outliers deal with continuous variables. These methods are not readily applicable to categorical data, such as incorrect/correct scores (0/1) and ordered rating scale scores (e.g., 0,..., 4) typical of multi-item tests and questionnaires. This study proposes two definitions of outlier scores suited for categorical…
Descriptors: Rating Scales, Scores, Regression (Statistics), Statistical Analysis

Helmes, Edward – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1989
Objective criteria for evaluating the Eysenck Personality Inventory's internal structure are discussed. An approach based on targeted rotations and the test's scoring key is proposed as a means of providing common criteria. Data from earlier structure and test results for 195 undergraduates support the utility of 3 criteria developed. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Factor Structure