Descriptor
Source
New Directions for Teaching… | 6 |
Author
Abrami, Philip C. | 1 |
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. | 1 |
Arreola, Raoul | 1 |
Bullock, Cheryl Davis | 1 |
Hoffman, Kevin M. | 1 |
Murray, Harry G. | 1 |
Rando, William L. | 1 |
d'Apollonia, Sylvia | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 6 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 2 |
Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Practitioners | 1 |
Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hoffman, Kevin M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003
Many U.S. institutions of higher education are initiating and expanding the use of the Internet for collecting and reporting student ratings of instruction. The primary objective of this study was to better understand the effects of the Internet on student ratings of instruction in higher education. More specifically, data were collected to…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Course Evaluation, Online Courses, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance

Rando, William L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Offers suggestions for writing student rating scale questions that target individual faculty needs and interests. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Evaluation Needs, Higher Education

Arreola, Raoul; Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
When faculty evaluation systems are proposed, students, faculty, and administrators often think only of questionnaires and assignment of data-processing tasks. Much more must be considered, including balancing the needs of all constituencies, designing student-rating forms and administration procedures, and the treatment and uses of the…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Educational Improvement, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Bullock, Cheryl Davis – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC)'s Evaluation Online (EON) offers a variety of options to faculty who want to solicit formative feedback electronically. Researchers interviewed faculty who have used this system for midterm student evaluation to examine their perceptions of it. In general, instructors reported that collecting…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Feedback (Response), Online Courses, Formative Evaluation

Murray, Harry G. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Formative evaluation of teaching is discussed, and ways of obtaining diagnostic feedback that will lead to improved teaching in large lecture classes are examined. A Teacher Behaviors Inventory is included. (MLW)
Descriptors: Class Size, College Instruction, College Students, Faculty Evaluation

Abrami, Philip C.; d'Apollonia, Sylvia – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1990
Multidimensional rating forms used for college student evaluation of faculty elicit information that can be used to evaluate the dimensions of instruction either separately or globally. Portions of the information may be useful for formative evaluation, but global items are best for making personnel decisions. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Decision Making, Educational Improvement, Employment Practices