Descriptor
| County Programs | 4 |
| Interviews | 4 |
| Questionnaires | 4 |
| Data Collection | 2 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| State Programs | 2 |
| Agricultural Personnel | 1 |
| Attitude Measures | 1 |
| Attitudes | 1 |
| Classification | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Publication Type
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Christiansen, John R.; And Others – 1971
Data were obtained on the activities and attiudes of 48 associate members and 229 commercial exhibitors at county and district fairs. Questionnaires and interviews were used to collect the data. Analysis of the data showed that most associate members had participated in more than one county or district fair in 1970, but less than one-fifth had…
Descriptors: Agricultural Personnel, Attitudes, County Programs, Data Collection
Steele, Sara M. – 1976
The Shawano County Evaluation Project examines the results of programing efforts by Extension personnel, county and statewide, over a 15-year period. It attempts to deal with results of all 13 Extension program areas, which range from 4-H to programs for doctors, lawyers, and other professionals. The paper describes the four major variables being…
Descriptors: County Programs, Cross Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Evaluation Methods
Williams, Anne S.; And Others – 1972
A study was conducted to examine the structure of leadership and the specific types of leaders as identified by attitudinal characteristics of individuals or groups of leaders. A 7-county development Federation in South-central Montana was studied. A pre-structured interview schedule containing 93 questions was administered to 102 leaders.…
Descriptors: Attitude Measures, Classification, Community Development, Community Leaders
Miller, Arden; And Others – 1985
A consortium of Elliott , Rowan, and Morgan Counties (Kentucky) received a grant from the Kentucky Department of Education to demonstrate methods by which existing and future gifted and talented programs may be evaluated. A Multiattribute Utility Model was adopted, because the model avoids the pitfalls of an experimental method while providing…
Descriptors: County Programs, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods


