Descriptor
Quotas | 51 |
Reverse Discrimination | 51 |
Affirmative Action | 46 |
Racial Discrimination | 35 |
Court Litigation | 22 |
Higher Education | 22 |
Minority Groups | 21 |
Equal Opportunities (Jobs) | 20 |
Equal Education | 17 |
Admission Criteria | 13 |
College Admission | 13 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Bakke v Regents of University… | 27 |
Hopwood v Texas | 3 |
Civil Rights Act 1964 Title… | 2 |
Defunis v Odegaard | 2 |
Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Abraham, Henry J. – University of Richmond Law Review, 1980
Outlines what reverse discrimination is and is not, and argues that the constitution is color-blind. Available from University of Richmond Law Review, School of Law, University of Richmond, VA 23173. (IRT)
Descriptors: Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Equal Protection, Quotas
Ruzicho, Andrew J. – Personnel Administrator, 1980
Uses a question-and-answer format to amplify the "Weber" decision and explain how the case affects an employer. Is particularly concerned with the role of quotas in affirmative action plans. (IRT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Quotas
Leap, Terry; Kovarsky, Irving – Labor Law Journal, 1980
Outlines major unanswered questions raised by the "Weber" case, such as how voluntary the quota system at Kaiser was, the union's duty of fair representation, and the nature of permissible benign quota systems. (IRT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Collective Bargaining, Court Litigation, Quotas
Fierce, Milfred C. – Freedomways, 1978
The historic Plessy vs. Ferguson decision is reviewed along with the 14th Amendment on which the decision was based. The Brown case is discussed. The issues and implications in the Bakke case are also elucidated. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Blacks, Court Litigation, Futures (of Society)
Robertson, David E.; Johnson, Ronald D. – Labor Law Journal, 1980
While still leaving some questions unanswered, the guidelines provided in the "Weber" case have clearly helped to clarify the legal status of race-conscious employee selection procedures. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Federal Legislation
Goldstein, Barry L. – New Perspectives, 1984
Presents a history of the numerical basis of federal affirmative action programs. Focuses particularly on the Philadelphia Plan and congressional activity since the mid-1960s. Argues that numbers have played a necessary role in attempts to alleviate racial discrimination. (KH)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Civil Rights Legislation, Desegregation Plans, Government Role
Reynolds, Wm. Bradford – 1984
"Affirmative action" is the term typically used to refer to two contrasting values: the value of equal opportunity and the value of equal results. The Justice Department under the Reagan Administration, however, draws a clear distinction between the two, and is committed to the "original" meaning of affirmative action. That is,…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Federal Courts, Public Policy

Fontham, Michael R. – Journal of Intergroup Relations, 1978
The intervention of government to require speeial treatment of designated groups on the basis of race, color, or sex is inconsistent with principles of equal treatment under American law. Regardless of past discrimination against certain classes, governmental determination to favor them at the expense of White males is not justified. (Author/WI)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Civil Rights, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Guidelines
Jones, Mack H. – Freedomways, 1978
Suggests that the importance of the Bakke case lies in the fact that it could act as a catalytic agent that would force social theoreticians, especially black ones, to face to an important question: what is the role of racism in the U.S. political economy? (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Black Influences, Futures (of Society), Political Issues
Wright, Bruce McM. – Freedomways, 1978
Suggests that Bakke was not rejected because he was white or because of a minority program, but rather because he was not highly qualified and in addition possibly because of his age. (Author/AM)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Minority Groups, Public Policy

Daniel, Philip T. K.; Timken, Kyle Edward – Journal of Law and Education, 1999
Recent litigation attacking affirmative action illustrates the need for competitive college admissions programs that avoid quota systems. The "Hopwood" decision overstepped its authority by rejecting Justice Powell's opinion in "Bakke." College admission programs must defend the use of racial consciousness by separating…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Admission, Court Litigation, Higher Education
Watson, Denton L. – Crisis, 1979
Several court cases concerning affirmative action programs both in education and in employment are reviewed in light of Titles VI and VII of the Civil Rights Act. Implications of past court decisions are discussed, as are possible future decisions. (MC)
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Blacks, Court Litigation, Equal Education
Hendrikson, Leslie – 1983
Following the desegregationists' victory in "Brown v. Board of Education" in 1954, there came a succession of gains for desegregation, until a new phenomenon developed in "Bakke v. Regents of University of California" in 1973. Since Bakke's grades and test scores were higher than those of some minority applicants admitted to…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, Court Litigation, Equal Education, Higher Education

Zirkel, Perry A. – Journal of Law and Education, 2000
In the July 1999 issue of this journal (EJ 591 141) Philip T. K. Daniel and Kyle Edward Timken contend that the Fifth Circuit "Hopwood" decision overstepped its authority by rejecting Justice Powell's opinion in "Bakke." Introduces article by Michael Rosman (EA 537 542) that takes strong issue with Daniel and Timken contending…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Admission, Court Doctrine, Court Litigation
Winter, Ralph K.; And Others – 1976
The participants in this discussion in addition to Ralph Winter, the moderator, include Owen Fiss and Richard Posner, professors of law; Vera Glaser and William Raspberry, newspaper columnists; and Paul Seabury, professor of political science. These specialists address various legal, ethical and practical issues related to the elimination of…
Descriptors: Admission (School), Affirmative Action, Employment Qualifications, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)