NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiwonge K. Mtande; Carl Lombard; Gonasagrie Nair; Stuart Rennie – Research Ethics, 2024
Although the use of the cluster randomized trial (CRT) design to evaluate vaccines, public health interventions or health systems is increasing, the ethical issues posed by the design are not adequately addressed, especially in low- and middle-income country settings (LMICs). To help reveal ethical challenges, qualitative interviews were conducted…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Ethics, Randomized Controlled Trials, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Charles Weijer – Research Ethics, 2024
The COVID-19 pandemic touched off an unprecedented search for vaccines and treatments. Without question, the development of vaccines to prevent COVID-19 was an enormous scientific accomplishment. Further, the RECOVERY and Solidarity trials identified effective treatments for COVID-19. But all was not success. The urgent need for COVID-19…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Immunization Programs, Research and Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Emma Law; Isabel Smith – Research Ethics, 2024
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the race to find an effective vaccine or treatment saw an 'extraordinary number' of clinical trials being conducted. While there were some key success stories, not all trials produced results that informed patient care. There was a significant amount of waste in clinical research during the pandemic which is said to…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Integrity, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Vellinga, Akke; Devine, Colum; Ho, Min Yun; Clarke, Colin; Leahy, Patrick; Bourke, Jane; Devane, Declan; Duane, Sinead; Kearney, Patricia – Research Ethics, 2020
Incentivising has shown to improve participation in clinical trials. However, ethical concerns suggest that incentives may be coercive, obscure trial risks and encourage individuals to enrol in clinical trials for the wrong reasons. The aim of our study was to develop and pilot a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to explore and identify preferences…
Descriptors: Patients, Value Judgment, Incentives, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gelfand, Scott D. – Research Ethics, 2019
In this essay, I suggest that a slightly modified version of Freedman's formulation of the clinical equipoise requirement is justified. I begin this essay with a brief discussion of the equipoise requirement. In the second and third sections, I discuss several objections to the clinical equipoise requirement as well as two attempts to justify the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Medical Research, Physician Patient Relationship, Parent Child Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Palmas, Walter – Research Ethics, 2018
A non-inferiority design accepts the possibility of some efficacy loss, as part of a "successful", statistically significant result. That loss may be excessive when the non-inferiority threshold is lenient. However, even stringent significance thresholds and safety monitoring may fail to adequately protect study participants when the…
Descriptors: Death, Randomized Controlled Trials, At Risk Persons, Patients
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weijer, Charles; Taljaard, Monica; Grimshaw, Jeremy M.; Edwards, Sarah J. L.; Eccles, Martin P. – Research Ethics, 2015
Owing to unique features of their design, cluster randomized trials complicate the interpretation of standard ethics guidelines. The recently published Ottawa statement on the ethical design and conduct of cluster randomized trials provides researchers and research ethics committees with detailed guidance on the design, conduct, and review of…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Research Design, Committees