NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Showing 1 to 15 of 106 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dahlia K. Remler; Gregg G. Van Ryzin – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
This article reviews the origins and use of the terms quasi-experiment and natural experiment. It demonstrates how the terms conflate whether variation in the independent variable of interest falls short of random with whether researchers find, rather than intervene to create, that variation. Using the lens of assignment--the process driving…
Descriptors: Quasiexperimental Design, Research Design, Experiments, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Foster, Colin – International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 2023
This paper introduces a simple, quotient effect size, termed (for 'quotient'), suitable for reporting on the effectiveness of educational interventions. The quotient effect size for a pre-test-post-test design is defined as the gain score (i.e. post-test minus pre-test) for the intervention group, divided by the gain score for the control group.…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Intervention, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Andrew P. Jaciw – American Journal of Evaluation, 2025
By design, randomized experiments (XPs) rule out bias from confounded selection of participants into conditions. Quasi-experiments (QEs) are often considered second-best because they do not share this benefit. However, when results from XPs are used to generalize causal impacts, the benefit from unconfounded selection into conditions may be offset…
Descriptors: Elementary School Students, Elementary School Teachers, Generalization, Test Bias
Sam Sims; Jake Anders; Matthew Inglis; Hugues Lortie-Forgues; Ben Styles; Ben Weidmann – Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University, 2023
Over the last twenty years, education researchers have increasingly conducted randomised experiments with the goal of informing the decisions of educators and policymakers. Such experiments have generally employed broad, consequential, standardised outcome measures in the hope that this would allow decisionmakers to compare effectiveness of…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Research Methodology, Randomized Controlled Trials, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2021
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) identifies existing research on educational interventions, assesses the quality of the research, and summarizes and disseminates the evidence from studies that meet WWC standards. The WWC aims to provide enough information so educators can use the research to make informed decisions in their settings. This…
Descriptors: Program Effectiveness, Intervention, Educational Research, Educational Quality
Wilhelmina van Dijk; Cynthia U. Norris; Sara A. Hart – Grantee Submission, 2022
Randomized control trials are considered the pinnacle for causal inference. In many cases, however, randomization of participants in social work research studies is not feasible or ethical. This paper introduces the co-twin control design study as an alternative quasi-experimental design to provide evidence of causal mechanisms when randomization…
Descriptors: Twins, Research Design, Randomized Controlled Trials, Quasiexperimental Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2022
Education decisionmakers need access to the best evidence about the effectiveness of education interventions, including practices, products, programs, and policies. It can be difficult, time consuming, and costly to access and draw conclusions from relevant studies about the effectiveness of interventions. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)…
Descriptors: Program Evaluation, Program Effectiveness, Standards, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2020
The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) systematic review process is the basis of many of its products, enabling the WWC to use consistent, objective, and transparent standards and procedures in its reviews, while also ensuring comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. The WWC systematic review process consists of five steps: (1) Developing…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Evaluation Methods, Research Reports, Standards
Timothy Lycurgus; Ben B. Hansen; Mark White – Grantee Submission, 2022
We present an aggregation scheme that increases power in randomized controlled trials and quasi-experiments when the intervention possesses a robust and well-articulated theory of change. Intervention studies using longitudinal data often include multiple observations on individuals, some of which may be more likely to manifest a treatment effect…
Descriptors: Statistical Analysis, Randomized Controlled Trials, Quasiexperimental Design, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mark Fredrickson; Ben B. Hansen – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Context: Assessments of baseline equivalency of intervention and control groups, "balance," play a critical role in evaluating educational interventions. The highest What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) of the Institute of Educational Studies (IES) standard for educational studies, "Meets WWC Design Standards Without Reservations,"…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Foreman, Leesa M.; Anderson, Kaitlin P.; Ritter, Gary W.; Wolf, Patrick J. – Educational Policy, 2019
We consider situations in which public charter school lotteries are neither universally conducted nor consistently documented. Such lotteries produce "broken" Randomized Control Trials, but provide opportunities to assess the internal validity of quasi-experimental research designs. Here, we present the results of a statewide charter…
Descriptors: Charter Schools, Institutional Evaluation, Matched Groups, Quasiexperimental Design
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Taber, Keith S. – Studies in Science Education, 2019
Experimental studies are often employed to test the effectiveness of teaching innovations such as new pedagogy, curriculum, or learning resources. This article offers guidance on good practice in developing research designs, and in drawing conclusions from published reports. Random control trials potentially support the use of statistical…
Descriptors: Instructional Innovation, Educational Research, Research Design, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gopalan, Maithreyi; Rosinger, Kelly; Ahn, Jee Bin – Review of Research in Education, 2020
In the past few decades, we have seen a rapid proliferation in the use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research. This trend, stemming in part from the "credibility revolution" in the social sciences, particularly economics, is notable along with the increasing use of randomized controlled trials in the strive toward…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Quasiexperimental Design, Research Problems, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boylan, Mark; Demack, Sean – Educational Research, 2018
Background: Current policy discourses emphasise the importance of evidence in education, including evidencing the impact of teacher professional learning on student outcomes. Randomised controlled trial (RCT) designs are promoted to measure 'impact'. Recent debates about this reflect longer standing methodological disputes. Advocates of…
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Randomized Controlled Trials, Innovation, Quasiexperimental Design
Steiner, Peter M.; Kim, Yongnam; Hall, Courtney E.; Su, Dan – Sociological Methods & Research, 2017
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-experimental designs like regression discontinuity (RD) designs, instrumental variable (IV) designs, and matching and propensity score (PS) designs are frequently used for inferring causal effects. It is well known that the features of these designs facilitate the identification of a causal estimand…
Descriptors: Graphs, Causal Models, Quasiexperimental Design, Randomized Controlled Trials
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8