Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Logical Thinking | 2 |
| Mathematics Tests | 2 |
| Reaction Time | 2 |
| Reliability | 2 |
| Timed Tests | 2 |
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Computer Assisted Testing | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| ACT Assessment | 2 |
| Graduate Record Examinations | 2 |
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
| Differential Aptitude Test | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkDavison, Mark L.; Semmes, Robert; Huang, Lan; Close, Catherine N. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
Data from 181 college students were used to assess whether math reasoning item response times in computerized testing can provide valid and reliable measures of a speed dimension. The alternate forms reliability of the speed dimension was .85. A two-dimensional structural equation model suggests that the speed dimension is related to the accuracy…
Descriptors: Computer Assisted Testing, Reaction Time, Reliability, Validity
Semmes, Robert; Davison, Mark L.; Close, Catherine – Applied Psychological Measurement, 2011
If numerical reasoning items are administered under time limits, will two dimensions be required to account for the responses, a numerical ability dimension and a speed dimension? A total of 182 college students answered 74 numerical reasoning items. Every item was taken with and without time limits by half the students. Three psychometric models…
Descriptors: Individual Differences, Logical Thinking, Timed Tests, College Students
