NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 11 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Turner, Edward C.; Algozzine, Kate – Clearing House, 1985
Reports findings of a study that examined the extent to which the variability observed in reading levels of common junior high textbooks was also present in four popular high school social studies texts. (FL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Diagnosis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Chavkin, Laura – Clearing House, 1997
Examines if the reading levels of state-adopted science textbooks at the high-school level are consistent with their intended reader levels. Finds that four of five chemistry textbooks had reading levels beyond high school, while biology textbooks fared better but not as well as the physics and physical science textbooks, which were on grade level…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, High Schools, Readability, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Giordano, Gerard – Clearing House, 1982
Offers a worksheet for evaluating the readability of content area textbooks. (RL)
Descriptors: Content Area Reading, Evaluation Criteria, Readability, Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rowls, Michael D.; Hess, Robert K. – Clearing House, 1984
Reports substantial discrepancies between publishers' estimates and independent estimates of the readability of secondary school-level language arts textbooks. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Language Arts, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Guth, Lorraine J.; Murphy, Laura – Clearing House, 1998
Offers an overview of "people first language," language which aims to create a positive view of people with disabilities in place of insensitive portrayals that stereotype and discriminate. Presents results of a readability analysis of such language, and suggests ways such terminology can be integrated into middle and high schools. (SR)
Descriptors: Attitudes toward Disabilities, Inclusive Schools, Language Usage, Middle Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Giordano, Gerard – Clearing House, 1987
Offers an analogy between passing a written driving test and actually driving a vehicle, and evaluating textbooks by the number of syllables in words and by sentence length and the students' ability to actually read the textbook. Provides an open textbook inventory to evaluate how well students interact with the book. (JC)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability, Reader Text Relationship, Reading Difficulties
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wood, Judy W.; Wooley, John A. – Clearing House, 1986
Describes six ways to adapt textbooks for studying purposes: chapter outlines, adapting chapter questions, adapting vocabulary, lowering reading levels, taping textbooks, and color coding textbooks. (HOD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Elementary Secondary Education, Learning Strategies, Mainstreaming
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Culhane, Joseph W. – Clearing House, 1973
Article outlined steps designed to help the teacher arrive at a more realistic indication of the ability of each student to handle basic instructional materials. (Author/RK)
Descriptors: Academic Ability, Cloze Procedure, Decision Making, Instructional Materials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brodbelt, Samuel – Clearing House, 1972
Author suggests criteria that can be weighted mathematically for computing comparable strengths and weaknesses in textbooks. (MB)
Descriptors: Course Objectives, Criteria, Curriculum Development, Mathematical Applications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fox, Barbara; Siedow, Mary – Clearing House, 1980
High school students were tested on their ability to follow directions written by content area teachers. Poor readers understood the directions only about half the time, which probably confounds their performance on classroom tests and assignments. Ways that teachers can make their instructions easier to read are suggested. (SJL)
Descriptors: Assignments, Classroom Communication, Content Area Reading, High Schools
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Steinley, Gary L. – Clearing House, 1987
Suggests that those who evaluate textbooks for adoption in schools use a framework such as the one included, which examines writing style, tone, analogies and illustrations, sentence and paragraph coherence, headings and subheadings, and location of charts, graphs, and figures. (JC)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Cohesion (Written Composition), Illustrations, Readability