Publication Date
| In 2025 | 1 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Captions | 2 |
| Difficulty Level | 2 |
| Readability | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Arabic | 1 |
| Brain | 1 |
| Cognitive Ability | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Discourse Analysis | 1 |
| English (Second Language) | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Collected Works - Proceedings | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| South Korea | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkTaegang Lee; Yoonhyoung Lee; Sungmook Choi – Language Learning & Technology, 2025
Empirical evidence remains sparse about how videos enhanced with first-language (L1) and second-language (L2) subtitles influence cognitive load in L2 learners. To address this point, 25 Korean undergraduate students were exposed to six short videos: baseline, L1-subtitled, and L2-subtitled videos at both high and low difficulty levels (determined…
Descriptors: Captions, Native Language, Second Language Learning, Language Processing
Download full textDavison, Alice, Ed.; And Others – 1981
The papers included in this collection represent as closely as possible the content and organization of the oral presentations delivered at a March 1980 conference on the use of readability formulas. The papers discuss the following topics: (1) an introduction to the conference, with general remarks on the uses and criticism of readability…
Descriptors: Captions, Difficulty Level, Discourse Analysis, Language Usage
