Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Readability | 6 |
| Readability Formulas | 6 |
| Written Language | 6 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Measurement Instruments | 2 |
| Reading Level | 2 |
| Reading Research | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Childrens Literature | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Communication Problems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Adult Literacy and Basic… | 1 |
| Journal of Business… | 1 |
| Journal of Documentation | 1 |
| Journal of Further and Higher… | 1 |
| Journal of Reading Behavior | 1 |
| Reading Research Quarterly | 1 |
Author
| Battison, Robbin | 1 |
| Beer, Colin | 1 |
| Goswami, Dixie | 1 |
| Harvey, Rhonda L. | 1 |
| Klare, George R. | 1 |
| Lawson, Celeste | 1 |
| Roy, Sherre | 1 |
| Tefki, Chaffai | 1 |
| Thomas, Georgelle | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 4 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Roy, Sherre; Beer, Colin; Lawson, Celeste – Journal of Further and Higher Education, 2020
Much of the contemporary literature around assessment practices in higher education focuses on assessment quality and its fitness for purpose. However, there is limited research around student comprehension of written assessment task descriptions and their understanding of the task itself. The purpose of this study was to examine a number of…
Descriptors: Readability, Written Language, Student Evaluation, College Students
Peer reviewedThomas, Georgelle; And Others – Journal of Reading Behavior, 1975
Analysis of variance applied to measured working times indicated that the Flesch takes significantly longer to use than Automated Readability Index and the Fog Count. (RB)
Descriptors: Measurement Instruments, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Level
Peer reviewedKlare, George R. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1974
Reviews formulas and related predictive devices that tell whether a particular piece of writing is likely to be readable to a particular group of readers. (RB)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Literature Reviews, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Peer reviewedTefki, Chaffai – Journal of Documentation, 1987
This review of findings in the field of readability research discusses the differences in meaning between readability and legibility, examines the origins and developments of readability formulas for children's and adult materials, and describes several of the best-known formulas for English-language materials. (46 references) (Author/LRW)
Descriptors: Childrens Literature, Correlation, Predictor Variables, Readability
Peer reviewedBattison, Robbin; Goswami, Dixie – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Surveys recent trends in the area of clear writing. Discusses the problem of incomprehensible language in functional writing (forms and documents). Considers solutions, particularly those developed by the Document Design Center. (PD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Higher Education, Models, Publications
Harvey, Rhonda L. – Adult Literacy and Basic Education, 1978
Educators and publishers (including state departments) need to know the readability and usability of periodicals and non-text materials. On the basis of a research review of the relationship between intended audience reading level and non-text materials readability, author recommends state and federal agencies develop materials which meet the…
Descriptors: Adults, Communication Problems, Federal Government, Government Publications

Direct link
