NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 8 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Karlinsky, Stewart S.; Koch, Bruce S. – Journal of Business Communication, 1983
Found that standard readability indexes by themselves are not useful in measuring readability and comprehensibility of income tax material. Also casts doubt on the use of only readability indexes to measure insurance, labor, and real estate contracts. (PD)
Descriptors: College Students, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Razek, Joseph R.; Cone, Randy E. – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Reports results of a survey on the readability of 12 recently published business communication textbooks. Shows that important differences in readability do exist and that the majority of texts were within or below the lower end of the undergraduate-level reading range. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Higher Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Stevens, Kevin T.; And Others – Journal of Business Communication, 1992
Suggests that readability formulas are methodologically flawed and inappropriate measures of the readability of materials written for adults. Argues that the cloze procedure is preferable because it assesses the readability of material by its intended audience. Notes that possible users of the cloze procedure include school systems, government…
Descriptors: Adults, Audience Awareness, Business Communication, Cloze Procedure
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Courtis, John K. – Journal of Business Communication, 1987
Investigates the effectiveness of the prose communication in contemporary corporate annual reports. Indicates that a sample of 65 Canadian annual reports for 1984 were classified as "difficult" to "very difficult" and beyond the fluent comprehension ease of 92 percent of the adult population and 56 percent of the investor…
Descriptors: Business Communication, Business English, Communication Problems, Communication Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Funkhouser, R. Gay – Journal of Business Communication, 1983
Proposes that documents such as contracts, policies, etc. can be evaluated adequately only by analyzing how they are used by consumers and then designing a testing approach that reflects their usability rather than their readability, difficulty, etc. Tested versions of a loan contract to compare differences among evaluation procedures. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Consumer Economics, Contracts, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Battison, Robbin; Goswami, Dixie – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Surveys recent trends in the area of clear writing. Discusses the problem of incomprehensible language in functional writing (forms and documents). Considers solutions, particularly those developed by the Document Design Center. (PD)
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Higher Education, Models, Publications
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Courtis, John K.; Hassan, Salleh – Journal of Business Communication, 2002
Examines reading ease between the English and Chinese versions of 65 corporate annual reports in Hong Kong and the English and Malay versions of 53 annual reports in Malaysia. Notes that the English passages in Malaysian annual reports are easier to read than the English passages in Hong Kong annual reports. Suggests that different language…
Descriptors: Annual Reports, Business Communication, Chinese, Communication Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Selzer, Jack – Journal of Business Communication, 1981
Doubts the ability of formulas to predict readability and questions their use as aids in writing readable prose. Points out that formulas also hamper the teaching of business writing because they emphasize written products instead of the writing process. (PD)
Descriptors: Business Communication, Business Correspondence, Higher Education, Readability