Publication Date
| In 2026 | 0 |
| Since 2025 | 6 |
| Since 2022 (last 5 years) | 37 |
| Since 2017 (last 10 years) | 128 |
| Since 2007 (last 20 years) | 210 |
Descriptor
| Readability Formulas | 670 |
| Readability | 479 |
| Reading Comprehension | 200 |
| Reading Research | 155 |
| Difficulty Level | 123 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 104 |
| Textbook Evaluation | 94 |
| Reading Instruction | 92 |
| Foreign Countries | 85 |
| Higher Education | 77 |
| Reading Materials | 77 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Practitioners | 61 |
| Teachers | 35 |
| Researchers | 16 |
| Administrators | 8 |
| Media Staff | 4 |
| Students | 1 |
Location
| Canada | 8 |
| Turkey | 8 |
| California | 6 |
| China | 6 |
| Indonesia | 6 |
| United Kingdom | 6 |
| United States | 5 |
| Australia | 4 |
| Iran | 4 |
| Japan | 4 |
| Texas | 4 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Individuals with Disabilities… | 2 |
| Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
| Bill of Rights | 1 |
| Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Institute for Academic Excellence, Inc. Madison, WI. – 1998
This report presents information regarding Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) guidelines as they relate to the Accelerated Reader program. The report states that a student's zone of proximal development is the range of book readability levels that will challenge a student without causing frustration or loss of motivation. It discusses factors…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Elementary Secondary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Rabin, Annette T. – 1990
The history of the evaluation of non-English written materials through the use of various mathematical formulae is reviewed. This process began in 1939 with Tharp's work in French, and has continued until the present. Formulas have been developed for Spanish, Russian, German, Hebrew, Chinese, and Vietnamese. In Europe, modifications of the Flesch…
Descriptors: Content Analysis, Foreign Countries, Readability, Readability Formulas
Rabin, Annette T. – 1987
The development of readability formulas for the evaluation of foreign language texts began with research in the United States on reading materials used in second language learning and has extended to many other countries first by adaptation of formulas intended for English language texts and then by original investigation. There exist now many…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Evaluation Problems, Language Research, Readability
Fry, Edward – 1982
"Writeability" is concerned with helping writers and editors produce materials on easier readability levels. A major input of most readability formulas is vocabulary difficulty. One way to increase readability is to use simple vocabulary or shorter words since word frequency studies show that more common words are shorter. The other…
Descriptors: Language Styles, Punctuation, Readability, Readability Formulas
Eisen, Emily – 1981
The Fry Readability Formula was used to investigate the readability levels of stories contained in basal readers of the 1979 edition of the "Open Court" series for grades one through six. The average readability levels of the stories were then compared to those found in the 1976 edition of the same series. The purposes of the study were…
Descriptors: Basal Reading, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Readability
Miccinati, Jeannette Louise – 1976
This paper on readability begins with a brief discussion of comprehension, including a definition, and then lists factors that influence comprehension, such as knowledge of vocabulary, long passages that are ambiguous, digressions, and unnecessary restatements. The paper then explores readability and presents a graph for estimating readability and…
Descriptors: Cloze Procedure, Elementary Secondary Education, Instructional Materials, Readability
Kincaid, J. P.; And Others – 1975
Three readability formulas were recalculated to be more suitable for Navy use. The three formulas are the Automated Readability Index (ARI), Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease Formula. They were derived from test results of 531 Navy enlisted personnel enrolled in four technical training schools. Personnel were tested for their reading…
Descriptors: Adult Basic Education, Military Personnel, Readability, Readability Formulas
Harris, Albert J.; Jacobson, Milton D. – 1974
This paper summarizes the work to date on the revised Harris-Jacobson Readability Formulas. The contents include "The Criterion," which discusses the criterion used in the development of the formulas; "Variables Employed," which includes percent of uncommon words, average sentence length, percent of long words, mean number of letters per word, and…
Descriptors: Basic Reading, Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
Peer reviewedVaughan, Joseph L., Jr. – Journal of Reading, 1976
Compares the Fry, Dale-Chall, and SMOG readability formulas and cautions users about their limitations. (RB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Measurement Instruments, Predictive Measurement, Predictive Validity
Peer reviewedFry, Edward – Language Arts, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewedJacobson, Milton D.; And Others – Journal of Reading, 1978
Concludes that after 50 years, the McCall-Crabbs norms are out of date and need to be revised. (MKM)
Descriptors: Educational Change, Educational Needs, Norms, Readability
Peer reviewedFry, Edward – Journal of Reading, 1977
Discusses why proper nouns should be counted and how to count syllables and words, recent work on the validity of readability formulas, and the readability graph extrapolated to college level. (JM)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Measurement Techniques, Readability
Peer reviewedGriesinger, Walter S.; Klene, Richard R. – Teaching of Psychology, 1984
Undergraduate students enrolled in a Principles of Psychology II course were asked to rate selections from introductory psychology texts for reading ease. These student ratings were then compared with the ratings obtained using the Flesch readability formula. Student ratings did not agree very well with the Flesch scores. (RM)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Research, Psychology, Readability
Peer reviewedCarver, Ronald P. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Readability
Peer reviewedCarver, Ronald P. – Reading Research Quarterly, 1975
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Higher Education, Measurement Instruments, Readability


