Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Reading Comprehension | 3 |
Reading Processes | 3 |
Word Recognition | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Bias | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
Context Clues | 1 |
Context Effect | 1 |
Error Analysis (Language) | 1 |
Eye Movements | 1 |
Function Words | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Carr, Thomas H. | 1 |
Haber, Ralph Norman | 1 |
O'Donnell, Patrick J. | 1 |
Rayner, Keith | 1 |
Schindler, Robert M. | 1 |
Sereno, Sara C. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Information Analyses | 1 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sereno, Sara C.; O'Donnell, Patrick J.; Rayner, Keith – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
Recent debates on lexical ambiguity resolution have centered on the subordinate-bias effect, in which reading time is longer on a biased ambiguous word in a subordinate-biasing context than on a control word. The nature of the control word--namely, whether it matched the frequency of the ambiguous word's overall word form or its contextually…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Word Recognition, Bias, Reading Processes

Carr, Thomas H. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
Three classes of research on reading are identified. The articles of this section pertain to investigation of the organization and operation of basic processing mechanisms underlying skilled reading; each is described briefly and commented upon. Particular attention is devoted to the articles on context effects. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Context Clues, Literature Reviews, Reading Achievement

Haber, Ralph Norman; Schindler, Robert M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1981
Subjects instructed to circle misspellings while reading prose were less likely to detect misspellings in function than in content words. Misspellings that changed the shape of a word were more likely to be detected. It is not clear whether differences between function and content words are due to familiarity or redundancy. (Author/RD)
Descriptors: Adults, Error Analysis (Language), Function Words, Language Patterns