NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bever, Thomas G.; And Others – Visible Language, 1991
Compares three linguistically motivated algorithms for assigning between-word space sizes for their impact on text readability. Finds that the readability of text can be improved with the aid of a rudimentary automatic parser. (PRA)
Descriptors: Higher Education, Layout (Publications), Readability, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Dyson, Mary C.; Kipping, Gary J. – Visible Language, 1998
Describes two experiments that explore the effect of line length and paging versus scrolling on reading from screen. Finds that long lines were read faster than short lines with no change in comprehension and that subject's judgment of reading ease did not correlate with performance. Concludes that further study is needed. (PA)
Descriptors: Layout (Publications), Readability, Reader Text Relationship, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ehri, Linnea C.; Wilce, Lee S. – Visible Language, 1974
Preliminary findings are consistent with the view that less experienced readers transform graphic to aural input before deriving a semantic interpretation. (RB)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Printing, Readability, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hartley, James; And Others – Visible Language, 1978
Results of a study involving approximately 500 sixth and seventh graders suggest that a two-column layout with traditional paragraphing denotation is more readable than a single-column layout, but that an extreme line length does not place an undue strain on the reader. (Examples of the two formats are included.) (GT)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Layout (Publications), Paragraphs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, John M.; McCombs, Maxwell E. – Visible Language, 1971
Descriptors: Letters (Alphabet), Printing, Readability, Reading Comprehension
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hartley, James – Visible Language, 1980
Comments on the rationale and methodology of the textual cue experiments of L. T. Frase and B. J. Schwartz (see EJ 203 980) and describes two studies that attempted to replicate and extend their findings using a different methodology. (Author/GT)
Descriptors: Adults, Cues, Organization, Readability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nanavati, Anuj A.; Bias, Randolph G. – Visible Language, 2005
One of the most important, and most studied, aspects of human perception is the act of reading. Reading has received much attention from researchers, both from a human information processing (HIP) approach and as a common, practical act that needs to be optimized, especially in the realm of human-computer interaction (HCI). One of the text …
Descriptors: Psychologists, Human Body, Reading Rate, Readability