Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 2 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Prior Learning | 4 |
Reading Comprehension | 4 |
Science Tests | 4 |
Comparative Analysis | 3 |
Adults | 2 |
Best Practices | 2 |
Identification | 2 |
Individual Differences | 2 |
Intervention | 2 |
Multiple Choice Tests | 2 |
Readability | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Danielle S. McNamara | 2 |
Ellen Orcutt | 2 |
Kathryn S. McCarthy | 2 |
Panayiota Kendeou | 2 |
Reese Butterfuss | 2 |
Brückner, Annette | 1 |
Chen, Shin-Feng | 1 |
Dutke, Stephan | 1 |
Leopold, Claudia | 1 |
Wang, Jing-Ru | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Research | 4 |
Journal Articles | 3 |
Education Level
Grade 10 | 1 |
High Schools | 1 |
Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Taiwan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Flesch Kincaid Grade Level… | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Reese Butterfuss; Kathryn S. McCarthy; Ellen Orcutt; Panayiota Kendeou; Danielle S. McNamara – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
Readers often struggle to identify the main ideas in expository texts. Existing research and instruction provide some guidance on how to encourage readers to identify main ideas. However, there is substantial variability in how main ideas are operationalized and how readers are prompted to identify main ideas. This variability hinders…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Reading Instruction, Best Practices
Reese Butterfuss; Kathryn S. McCarthy; Ellen Orcutt; Panayiota Kendeou; Danielle S. McNamara – Grantee Submission, 2023
Readers often struggle to identify the main ideas in expository texts. Existing research and instruction provide some guidance on how to encourage readers to identify main ideas. However, there is substantial variability in how main ideas are operationalized and how readers are prompted to identify main ideas. This variability hinders…
Descriptors: Reading Processes, Reading Comprehension, Reading Instruction, Best Practices
Summarizing as a Strategy for Science Text Comprehension: Text-Based versus Content-Based Processing
Leopold, Claudia; Brückner, Annette; Dutke, Stephan – Discourse Processes: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2019
In this experiment, we contrasted two instructions in which the focus of summary writing was varied. We predicted that students would better understand a scientific text when they learn to focus their summaries on the referential content rather than on the hierarchical structure of the text. In a 2 × 2 factorial experiment, 85 Grade-10 students…
Descriptors: Grade 10, High School Students, Writing Skills, Prediction
Wang, Jing-Ru; Chen, Shin-Feng – Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2014
This study used a Chinese-language version of the Index of Science Reading Awareness (ISRA) to investigate metacognitive awareness and the Reading Comprehension of Science Test (RCST) to explore comprehension of science text by Taiwanese students. Structural equation modeling (SEM) results confirmed the validity of the underlying models of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Metacognition, Reading Comprehension, Validity