Descriptor
| Error Correction | 2 |
| Reading Instruction | 2 |
| Sight Method | 2 |
| Sight Vocabulary | 2 |
| Teaching Methods | 2 |
| Word Recognition | 2 |
| Beginning Reading | 1 |
| Decoding (Reading) | 1 |
| Developmental Disabilities | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Instructional Effectiveness | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedBarbetta, Patricia M.; And Others – Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1993
Effects of 2 procedures (either whole word or phonetic-prompt) for error correction were compared during drills in sight word recognition of 5 students (ages 8 and 9) with developmental disabilities. Results from instruction, same-day tests, and next-day tests indicated that more words were learned in the whole word condition. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Developmental Disabilities, Error Correction, Instructional Effectiveness
Conners, Frances A. – American Journal on Mental Retardation, 1992
Analysis of research on reading instruction for children with moderate mental retardation indicated that word analysis instruction is a feasible option; word analysis is the most effective method of oral reading error correction; and the strongest sight-word instruction methods include those that use picture integration, constant delay, and the…
Descriptors: Decoding (Reading), Elementary Secondary Education, Error Correction, Moderate Mental Retardation
