NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 10 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2007
The "Auditory Discrimination in Depth (ADD) Program[R]" (currently called the "Lindamood Phonemic Sequencing (LiPS) Program[R]") is designed to teach students skills to successfully decode words and to identify individual sounds and blends in words. Initial activities engage students in discovering the lip, tongue, and mouth…
Descriptors: Grade 1, Reading Research, Phonemics, Reading Achievement
Ollila, Lloyd; And Others – Elementary English, 1974
A Russian method of teaching beginning reading using auditory discrimination of phonemes training was shown to be superior to two American methods. (JH)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Beginning Reading, Graphemes, Phonemes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Samuels, S. Jay – Reading Teacher, 1971
Describes research results showing that letter-name knowledge does not aid the beginning reader in pronouncing words composed of the same letters. Suggests that letter-sound knowledge does have a beneficial effect. Bibliography. (RW)
Descriptors: Alphabets, Auditory Discrimination, Beginning Reading, Behavioral Objectives
Williams, Joanna P. – 1970
Strategies children use when they recognize words were explored. To measure the effectiveness of two different methods of training children to attend to the critical features of letters, 40 first-grade urban children were presented two pairs of letters (similar and dissimilar) simultaneously or successively. Unexpectedly, it was found that with…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Beginning Reading, Kindergarten Children, Letters (Alphabet)
Janssen, David Rainsford – 1972
This study investigated alternate methods of letter discrimination pretraining and word recognition training in young children. Seventy kindergarten children were trained to recognize eight printed words in a vocabulary list by a mixed-list paired-associate method. Four of the stimulus words had visual response choices (pictures) and four had…
Descriptors: Associative Learning, Auditory Discrimination, Decoding (Reading), Kindergarten Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McNinch, George – Reading Research Quarterly, 1971
Suggests that preinstructional evaluation in the areas of mental age, auditory memory, letter names, and the use of context-auditory clues would aid in making predictive, diagnostic judgments as to later reading achievement. (VJ)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Cognitive Development, Context Clues
Adams, Harriet R. – 1978
The purpose of this study was to determine if the relationships among alphabet skills, auditory discrimination, and visual discrimination for five-year-olds prior to kindergarten were similar to those found in studies of subskills of first grade children. The sample consisted of 23 middle class nursery school children between the ages of 5.1 and…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Early Childhood Education, Early Experience, Grade 1
Venezky, Richard L. – 1971
The assumption that the learning of letter names in their proper sequence is a prerequisite for literacy can be questioned. There is disagreement over the value of early letter-name training. It is variously said to aid in letter or word discrimination, to aid in attaching sounds to letters, and to interfere with both of these tasks. An analysis…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Letters (Alphabet), Predictor Variables, Reading Achievement
Chastain, Garvin; And Others – 1981
The hypothesis that word context reduces visual rather than acoustic confusion between possible targets was tested in a series of experiments. All involved tachistoscopic presentation of letter strings followed by a pattern mask. Data from eight college students showed that target letters that are confusable only visually and acoustically…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Cognitive Processes, College Students, Decoding (Reading)
Cohn, Marvin – 1974
This paper examines the letter recognition difficulties of 322 primary grade students with decoding problems. Each student was asked to name all of the lower case letters, which were presented in non-alphabetical order. Each response was accurately recorded to determine which letters were taken for others. All responses were then tallied, and an…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Beginning Reading, Decoding (Reading), Graphemes