Descriptor
| Elementary Education | 2 |
| Readability Formulas | 2 |
| Reading Comprehension | 2 |
| Reading Research | 2 |
| Test Validity | 2 |
| Testing Problems | 2 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Readability | 1 |
| Reading Diagnosis | 1 |
| Reading Instruction | 1 |
| Reading Tests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Reading Horizons | 1 |
Publication Type
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Stanford Diagnostic Reading… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedDanielson, Kathy Everts – Reading Horizons, 1987
Lists the dangers of readability formulas and concludes that while they may be a necessary evil, they should not be used as the underlying structure of a reading program. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Readability Formulas, Reading Comprehension, Reading Instruction
Download full textMarr, Mary Beth – 1982
The passage comprehensibility of three diagnostic reading tests--the Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test, the Spache Diagnostic Reading Scales, and the Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty--was evaluated using the following text variables: content familiarity, vocabulary, the number of idea units in the text, the number of text-based inferences…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education, Readability, Readability Formulas
